State of Conservation
31
Reports
12
Properties concerned
12
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:1999close
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Numerous ruins in the city that in danger of collapse in the event of an earthquake |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Italy Holy See |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Italy Holy See |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Brazil |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Brazil |
Year: | 1987 |
Document Source: | SC-87/CONF.005/9 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Brazil |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.204/INF.19,WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.8A,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.8B,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.8C |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.202/INF.6,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B,WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Finland |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/2,WHC.93/CONF.002/2 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.