English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
11
Reports
3
Properties
3
States Parties
States Parties:  United States of America
Year:  2011
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
States Parties:  United States of America
Year:  2006
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties:  United States of America
Year:  2004
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Concerns about numbers of boaters in Florida Bay and their impacts on bottomland wilderness, including especially propeller scars from boat groundings.
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2014
Document Source:  WHC-14/38.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2012
Document Source:  WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2009
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-09/33.COM/7A
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: h) Educational reform not implemented
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2008
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-08/32.COM/7A
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Educational reform not implemented.
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2007
Document Source:  WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Educational reform not implemented
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2006
Document Source:  WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Add,WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Implementation of quarantine measures
States Parties:  India
Year:  2002
Document Source:  WHC.02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: human-tiger conflicts
Properties
Categories

Regions


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.