State of Conservation
321
Reports
107
Properties
65
States Parties
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Worrying state of conservation of Agra Fort |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Structural instability of Stele 3 |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Structural instability of Stele 3 |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Structural instability of Stele 3 |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Structural instability of Stele 3 |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Lack of documentation and equipment |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/2,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2019 |
Danger List: | Yes |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2018 |
Danger List: | Yes |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2017 |
Danger List: | Yes |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7A.Add,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Properties
Categories
Regions
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Belgium Benin Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Bulgaria Cambodia Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Cyprus Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia France Georgia Germany Greece Guatemala India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Iraq Ireland Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Lesotho Libya Mali Malta Mauritius Mexico Morocco Nepal Netherlands Oman Pakistan Paraguay Peru Poland Russian Federation Saudi Arabia Slovenia South Africa Sri Lanka Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uruguay Viet Nam
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.