English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
30
Reports
3
Properties
1
States Parties
States Parties:  Poland
Year:  2006
Document Source:  WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movement
States Parties:  Poland
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Effect on forest biomes through drainage of agricultural land on the Belarus side and a reservoir on the Polish side; b) Presence of an artificial fence along the international boundary impeding large mammal movement.
States Parties:  Poland
Year:  2004
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Fencing along the international border
States Parties:  Poland
Year:  2003
Document Source:  WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Poland
Year:  2001
Document Source:  WHC-2001/CONF.205/5,WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Poland
Year:  2000
Document Source:  WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Poland
Year:  1999
Document Source:  WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/5
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Poland
Year:  1998
Document Source:  WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Poland
Year:  1997
Document Source:  WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Poland
Year:  2011
Document Source:  WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Properties
Categories

Regions
States Parties
Poland

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.