State of Conservation
11
Reports
6
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2010close
Region:
Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
States Parties: | Belize |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Panama |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Add,WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Implementation of quarantine measures |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Weaknesses in quarantine measures; b) Passage of international and national marine traffic |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.204/INF.9,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.201/INF.13,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 1987 |
Document Source: | SC-87/CONF.005/INF.1 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Fires |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Honduras |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Lack of infrastructure and services for small producers and potential tourism initiatives hinder sustainable economic development and are underlying causes for poverty, leading to over-exploitation of natural resources |
Danger List: | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.