Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

85
Reports
19
Properties concerned
14
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Mixedclose
Date end:2004close
States Parties: Mali
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Drought Illegal activities Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Severe famine facing Bandiagara and massive selling of cultural objects
States Parties: Mali
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Other Threats: Need to improve the conservation of both natural and cultural heritage
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B
Other Threats: Deterioration of the rock and the mural paintings
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 1992
Document Source: CLT-92/CONF.003/2,WHC-92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 1988
Document Source: SC-88/CONF.001/13
Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
Other Threats: Discolouring of the limestone cliffs
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
Other Threats: Discolouring of the limestone cliffs
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 1992
Document Source: CLT-92/CONF.003/3
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/4
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.004/13
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Avalanche/ landslide Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Avalanche/ landslide Fire (widlfires) Ground transport infrastructure Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/INF.10
Threats*: Fire (widlfires) Ground transport infrastructure Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Fire (widlfires) Ground transport infrastructure Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Fire (widlfires) Ground transport infrastructure Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Accident of a crane which damaged one of the most important monuments at Machu Picchu, the Intihuatana or stone sundial
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.7
Threats*: Fire (widlfires) Ground transport infrastructure Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Fire (widlfires) Ground transport infrastructure Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Fire (widlfires) Ground transport infrastructure Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Input of excess energy Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Need for an inventory of the park's natural and cultural resources

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top