English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
152
Reports
24
Properties
12
States Parties
Previous 1 ...  5 6 7 8 See All
States Parties:  Algeria
Year:  2015
Document Source:  WHC-15/39.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties:  Algeria
Year:  2013
Document Source:  WHC-13/37.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties:  Algeria
Year:  2011
Document Source:  WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties:  Algeria
Year:  2009
Document Source:  WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties:  Algeria
Year:  2008
Document Source:  WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: poor conservation conditions for the archaeological remains
States Parties:  Algeria
Year:  2007
Document Source:  WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Poor conservation conditons for the archeological remains
States Parties:  Algeria
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: vegetation with roots seriously affecting archaeological remains
States Parties:  Algeria
Year:  2003
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges
States Parties:  Algeria
Year:  2002
Document Source:  WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges
States Parties:  Lebanon
Year:  2012
Document Source:  WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance
States Parties:  Lebanon
Year:  2010
Document Source:  WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance
States Parties:  Jordan
Year:  2008
Document Source:  WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Unstable structures and lack of security
Previous 1 ...  5 6 7 8 See All

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.