English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
10
Reports
1
Properties
1
States Parties
States Parties:  Ethiopia
Year:  2000
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community Land conversion
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
States Parties:  Ethiopia
Year:  1999
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-99/CONF.204/4,WHC-99/CONF.209/13
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community Land conversion
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
States Parties:  Ethiopia
Year:  1998
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-98/CONF.201/3A,WHC-98/CONF.203/7
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community Land conversion
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
States Parties:  Ethiopia
Year:  1997
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-97/CONF.204/2A,WHC-97/CONF.208/8A
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community Land conversion
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
States Parties:  Ethiopia
Year:  1996
Document Source:  WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community Land conversion
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
States Parties:  Ethiopia
Year:  1995
Document Source:  WHC-95/CONF.201/4
Threats*: Civil unrest Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Ethiopia
Year:  1992
Document Source:  CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Civil unrest
States Parties:  Ethiopia
Year:  1991
Document Source:  SC-91/CONF.002/4 Add.
Threats*: Civil unrest
States Parties:  Ethiopia
Year:  1985
Document Source:  SC-85/CONF.008/9
Threats*: Civil unrest
States Parties:  Ethiopia
Year:  1984
Document Source:  SC/84/CONF.004/9
Threats*: Civil unrest

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.