English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
62
Reports
62
Properties
47
States Parties
 1 2 3 4  See All
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Lack of consolidation and engineering measures
States Parties:  India
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Threats to monuments’ foundations due to geological instability of riverbank
States Parties:  Ethiopia
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Lack of documentation and equipment
States Parties:  Iraq
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Fragile mud brick structures
States Parties:  Poland
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Oman
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Deterioration of the earthen structure of the Fort
States Parties:  Indonesia
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Uncontrolled vendors within and around the property
States Parties:  Albania
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Lack of adequate protection and conservation of the site; b) Poor state of conservation of the property ; c) Insufficient implementation of the recommendations of the joint missions
States Parties:  India
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Peru
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Peru
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance of historic buildings; b) Use of reinforced concrete in the centre of town
States Parties:  Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Deterioration of the architectural and urban coherence and integrity of the property; b) Lack of adequate conservation mechanisms.
States Parties:  Afghanistan
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Consolidation of the cliffs and nichesb) Lack of a long-term on-site monitoring systemc) Demining
States Parties:  Portugal
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Lithuania
Russian Federation
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Italy
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  India
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Threats to monuments’ foundations due to geological instability of riverbank
States Parties:  Pakistan
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Lack of capacity in conservation techniques; b) Lack of monitoring system
States Parties:  Panama
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Deterioration and destruction of the fabric by environmental factors
States Parties:  Georgia
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work of the monuments
 1 2 3 4  See All

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.