State of Conservation
19
Reports
19
Properties
19
States Parties
Table View
List view
Statistics
Map
Excel file
All SOC (Zip file)| States Parties: |
 Mauritania
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
 Syrian Arab Republic
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
 Tunisia
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
 Panama
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| Other Threats: | Severe deterioration of historic buildings that threaten the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; |
| States Parties: |
 Oman
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| Other Threats: | Deterioration of the earthen structures of the Fort |
| States Parties: |
 Pakistan
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
 Nepal
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| Other Threats: | Impact of the new structure of the Maya Devi Temple (constructed in 2002) on the archaeological remains, as well as on the visual integrity. |
| States Parties: |
 India
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| Other Threats: | Loss of character of the cultural landscape directly associated with the property and its outstanding universal value |
| States Parties: |
 Honduras
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| Other Threats: | Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena |
| States Parties: |
 Serbia
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| Other Threats: | Unsatisfactory state of conservation and maintenance of the property. |
| States Parties: |
 Montenegro
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
 Lebanon
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
 Colombia
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
 France
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
 Philippines
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
 Ethiopia
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
 Benin
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| Other Threats: | Fire; Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components |
| States Parties: |
 United Republic of Tanzania
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| Other Threats: | b) Environmental pressures in relation with the Malindi port projectc) Natural disasters and lack of risk-preparedness |
| States Parties: |
 Mali
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| Other Threats: | Inappropriate design and scale of new Ahmed Baba Cultural Centre in the vicinity of the Sankoré Mosque; lack of detailed drawings supplied to the Committee |
Properties
Categories
Regions
States Parties
Benin Colombia Ethiopia France Honduras India Lebanon Mali Mauritania Montenegro Nepal Oman Pakistan Panama Philippines Serbia Syrian Arab Republic Tunisia United Republic of TanzaniaThreats
Legal framework (19)
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
