English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
16
Reports
4
Properties
5
States Parties
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2003 Input of excess energy, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2001 Input of excess energy, Yes
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2000 Input of excess energy, Yes
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 1999 Input of excess energy, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 1998 Input of excess energy, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 1997 Input of excess energy, No
mosi-oa-tunya / victoria fallsMosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls zambia,zimbabwe Zambia
Zimbabwe
2008 Input of excess energy, No
mosi-oa-tunya / victoria fallsMosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls zambia,zimbabwe Zambia
Zimbabwe
2007 Input of excess energy, No
mosi-oa-tunya / victoria fallsMosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls zambia,zimbabwe Zambia
Zimbabwe
2006 Input of excess energy, No
sagarmatha national parkSagarmatha National Park nepal Nepal 2018 Input of excess energy, No
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park united states of america United States of America 2012 Input of excess energy, No
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park united states of america United States of America 2010 Input of excess energy, No
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park united states of america United States of America 2008 Input of excess energy, No
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park united states of america United States of America 2006 Input of excess energy, No
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park united states of america United States of America 2005 Input of excess energy, No
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park united states of america United States of America 2004 Input of excess energy,
Other Threats: Brucella infection threat to bison population
No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.