State of Conservation
|Site||State Party||Year||Threats*||Danger List|
|historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu||peru Peru||1999||Fire (widlfires), Ground transport infrastructure, Management systems/ management plan,||No|
|kakadu national parkKakadu National Park||australia Australia||1999||Management systems/ management plan, Mining,||No|
|mount emei scenic area, including leshan giant buddha scenic areaMount Emei Scenic Area, including Leshan Giant Buddha Scenic Area||china China||1999||Ground transport infrastructure,||No|
|ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area||united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania||1999||Ground transport infrastructure,||No|
|st kildaSt Kilda||united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland||1999||Management systems/ management plan, Oil and gas,||No|
|tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness||australia Australia||1999||Forestry /wood production, Ground water pollution,||No|
|tikal national parkTikal National Park||guatemala Guatemala||1999||Management systems/ management plan, Storms,||No|
|tongariro national parkTongariro National Park||new zealand New Zealand||1999||Management activities, Society's valuing of heritage, Volcanic eruption,||No|
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).