Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

7
Reports
7
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2005close
Date end:2005close
Threats* : Erosion and siltation/ depositionclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) peru Peru 2005 Erosion and siltation/ deposition, No
fortifications on the caribbean side of panama: portobelo-san lorenzoFortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo panama Panama 2005 Erosion and siltation/ deposition,
Other Threats: Deterioration and destruction of the fabric by environmental factors
 No
island of goreeIsland of Gorée senegal Senegal 2005 Erosion and siltation/ deposition,
Other Threats: a) Threatened state of the buildings; b) Construction of the replica of the Goree Memoria
 No
kasbah of algiersKasbah of Algiers algeria Algeria 2005 Erosion and siltation/ deposition,
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance of housing; b) Collapse of houses (three dead and others injured in May 2002)
 No
ksar of ait-ben-haddouKsar of Ait-Ben-Haddou morocco Morocco 2005 Erosion and siltation/ deposition,
Other Threats: Near total abandonment of the site
 No
ruins of kilwa kisiwani and ruins of songo mnaraRuins of Kilwa Kisiwani and Ruins of Songo Mnara united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2005 Erosion and siltation/ deposition,
Other Threats: - Collapsing monuments- No participation of communit
 Yes
tipasaTipasa algeria Algeria 2005 Erosion and siltation/ deposition,
Other Threats: vegetation with roots seriously affecting archaeological remains
 Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top