State of Conservation
12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2004close
Date end:2004close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
angkorAngkor | cambodia Cambodia | 2004 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | Yes |
archaeological site of cyreneArchaeological Site of Cyrene | libya Libya | 2004 | Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Uncontrolled growth of plants and trees |
No |
city of graz – historic centre and schloss eggenbergCity of Graz – Historic Centre and Schloss Eggenberg | austria Austria | 2004 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul | turkiye Türkiye | 2004 | Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the civil architecture |
No |
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa | peru Peru | 2004 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal | 2004 | Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Fire |
Yes |
ksar of ait-ben-haddouKsar of Ait-Ben-Haddou | morocco Morocco | 2004 | Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: State of abandonment and degradation |
No |
mahabodhi temple complex at bodh gayaMahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodh Gaya | india India | 2004 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
medina of fezMedina of Fez | morocco Morocco | 2004 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
megalithic temples of maltaMegalithic Temples of Malta | malta Malta | 2004 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
rock art of altaRock Art of Alta | norway Norway | 2004 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
walled city of baku with the shirvanshah's palace and maiden towerWalled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower | azerbaijan Azerbaijan | 2004 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.