State of Conservation
5
Reports
5
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Mixedclose
Date Start:
2015close
Date end:2015close
| Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ecosystem and relict cultural landscape of lope-okandaEcosystem and Relict Cultural Landscape of Lopé-Okanda | gabon Gabon |
2015 | Ground transport infrastructure, Human resources, Illegal activities, Major linear utilities, Management systems/ management plan, | No |
| historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu | peru Peru |
2015 | Avalanche/ landslide, Flooding, Governance, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Legal framework, Management systems/ management plan, | No |
| maloti-drakensberg parkMaloti-Drakensberg Park | lesotho,south africa Lesotho South Africa |
2015 | Interpretative and visitation facilities,
Legal framework,
Management activities,
Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Need for further research and documentation to establish an inventory of rock art in Sehlabathebe National Park; Need for study of the potential cultural contribution of other landscape elements to the cultural values of Sehlabathebe National Park |
No |
| ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area | united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania |
2015 | Crop production, Governance, Ground transport infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Invasive/alien terrestrial species, Land conversion, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, Management activities, Management systems/ management plan, Renewable energy facilities, | No |
| tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness | australia Australia |
2015 | Forestry /wood production, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Management systems/ management plan, Mining, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
