State of Conservation
8
Reports
3
Properties
1
States Parties
Table View
List view
Statistics
Map
Excel file
All SOC (Zip file)| States Parties: |
 Canada
|
| Year: | 2018 |
| Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan Oil and gas |
| States Parties: |
Canada
|
| Year: | 2016 |
| Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan Oil and gas |
| States Parties: |
Canada
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan Oil and gas |
| States Parties: |
Canada
|
| Year: | 2013 |
| Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Oil and gas |
| States Parties: |
Canada
|
| Year: | 2010 |
| Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Housing Invasive/alien terrestrial species Mining Temperature change |
| States Parties: |
Canada
|
| Year: | 2019 |
| Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan Mining Oil and gas Other climate change impacts Water infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge |
| States Parties: |
Canada
|
| Year: | 2017 |
| Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan Mining Oil and gas Other climate change impacts Water infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge |
| States Parties: |
Canada
|
| Year: | 2015 |
| Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Properties
Categories
Regions
States Parties
Canada
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
