State of Conservation
69
Reports
28
Properties
20
States Parties
Threats* :
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 1991 |
Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/3 |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
Other Threats: | Lack of stability of the rock; Lack of convergence of local opinions on the real extent of the problem, the possible solutions |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
Other Threats: | Poor quality of the stone and weaknesses in the resistance; Cracks; Consolidation work is not undertaken |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
Other Threats: | Poor quality of the stone and weaknesses in the resistance; Cracks; Consolidation work is not undertaken |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
Other Threats: | Impact of the four temporary shelters constructed in 2008; Demolition of most of the traditional “tukul” dwellings |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
Other Threats: | h) Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches. |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
Other Threats: | Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches. |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
Other Threats: | Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2019 |
Danger List: | Yes |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7A.Add,WHC/19/43.COM/7A.add.2 |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2018 |
Danger List: | Yes |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2017 |
Danger List: | Yes |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7A.Add,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2016 |
Danger List: | Yes |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2015 |
Danger List: | Yes |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
States Parties: |
![]() |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
Threats*: | Relative humidity |
Other Threats: | structural problems |
Properties
Categories
Regions
States Parties
Bangladesh Bulgaria China Egypt Ethiopia Greece India Iran (Islamic Republic of) Italy Lebanon Libya Malta Pakistan Peru Poland Portugal Romania Syrian Arab Republic Uzbekistan YemenThreats
Relative humidity (69)
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.