State of Conservation
24
Reports
11
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2017close
Region:
Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Numerous ruins in the city that in danger of collapse in the event of an earthquake |
States Parties: | Chile |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | a) Lack of maintenance of historic buildings; b) Use of reinforced concrete in the centre of town |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Deliberate neglect of historic properties |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Brazil |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Brazil |
Year: | 1987 |
Document Source: | SC-87/CONF.005/9 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Brazil |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B,WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Material decay and abandonment of buildings, as well as the effect of heavy traffic on historic buildings |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add2 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Material decay and abandonment of buildings |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Lack of systematic monitoring of the site |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Lack of systematic monitoring of the site |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Lack of systematic monitoring of the site |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Lack of systematic monitoring of the site |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.