State of Conservation
|Site||State Party||Year||Threats*||Danger List|
|hierapolis-pamukkaleHierapolis-Pamukkale||turkey Turkey||2002|| Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation,
Other Threats: Discolouring of the limestone cliffs
|historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu||peru Peru||2002||Fire (widlfires), Ground transport infrastructure, Management systems/ management plan,||No|
|kakadu national parkKakadu National Park||australia Australia||2002||Invasive/alien terrestrial species, Management systems/ management plan, Mining, Surface water pollution,||No|
|ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area||united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania||2002|| Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Ground transport infrastructure,
Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation,
Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals,
Other Threats: Decline of the fauna populations
|st kildaSt Kilda||united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland||2002||Management systems/ management plan, Oil and gas,||No|
|tongariro national parkTongariro National Park||new zealand New Zealand||2002||Management activities, Society's valuing of heritage, Volcanic eruption,||No|
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).