English Français
Please note that given the exceptional circumstances related to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, regular mail sent to the World Heritage Centre in Paris cannot be processed on a normal basis for the moment. To avoid any delays in the treatment of statutory and/or general correspondence, please send systematically to the concerned addressee within the World Heritage Centre an electronic copy of all the correspondence you may wish to transmit. Thank you for your understanding.

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
8
Reports
8
Properties
9
States Parties
States Parties:  Niger
Year:  2016
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC/16/40.COM/7A
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
States Parties:  Lithuania
Russian Federation
Year:  2016
Document Source:  WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
States Parties:  Panama
Year:  2016
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC/16/40.COM/7A
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: Fragile state of the property and accelerated degradation by environmental factors, lack of maintenance and limited conservation planning
States Parties:  Pakistan
Year:  2016
Document Source:  WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb
States Parties:  Georgia
Year:  2016
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC/16/40.COM/7A
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
States Parties:  Ethiopia
Year:  2016
Document Source:  WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
States Parties:  United Republic of Tanzania
Year:  2016
Document Source:  WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: Deterioration of the architectural heritage fabric
States Parties:  Italy
Year:  2016
Document Source:  WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.