State of Conservation
11
Reports
11
Properties concerned
12
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2010close
Date end:2010close
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Other climate change impacts |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Flooding |
States Parties: | Iraq |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Flooding |
Other Threats: | Fragile mud brick structures |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Dominican Republic |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Storms |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Storms |
Other Threats: | Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife |
States Parties: | Sudan |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Flooding |
States Parties: | Zambia Zimbabwe |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Drought |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Drought |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Temperature change |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Flooding |
Other Threats: | a) Inappropriate design and scale of new Ahmed Baba Cultural Centre in the vicinity of the Sankoré Mosque; lack of detailed drawings supplied to the Committee; |
States Parties: | Canada United States of America |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Temperature change |
States Parties
Canada Dominican Republic Egypt Iraq Mali Mauritania Nepal Senegal Sudan United States of America Zambia Zimbabwe
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.