English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
2269
Reports
417
Properties
134
States Parties
States Parties:  Jordan
Year:  2019
Document Source:  WHC/19/43.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Jordan
Year:  2017
Document Source:  WHC/17/41.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Belarus
Poland
Year:  2019
Document Source:  WHC/19/43.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Alterations of the hydrological regime; Border fence impeding mammal movements
States Parties:  Belarus
Poland
Year:  2017
Document Source:  WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Alterations of the hydrological regime; Border fence impeding mammal movements
States Parties:  Belarus
Poland
Year:  2016
Document Source:  WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Belarus
Poland
Year:  2009
Document Source:  WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movements
States Parties:  Belarus
Poland
Year:  2008
Document Source:  WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movements
States Parties:  Belarus
Poland
Year:  2007
Document Source:  WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movements
States Parties:  Belarus
Poland
Year:  2006
Document Source:  WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movement
States Parties:  Belarus
Poland
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Effect on forest biomes through drainage of agricultural land on the Belarus side and a reservoir on the Polish side; b) Presence of an artificial fence along the international boundary impeding large mammal movement.
States Parties:  Belarus
Poland
Year:  2004
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Fencing along the international border
States Parties:  Belarus
Poland
Year:  2003
Document Source:  WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Belarus
Poland
Year:  2001
Document Source:  WHC-2001/CONF.205/5,WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Belarus
Poland
Year:  2000
Document Source:  WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Belarus
Poland
Year:  1999
Document Source:  WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/5
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Belarus
Poland
Year:  1998
Document Source:  WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Belarus
Poland
Year:  1997
Document Source:  WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Palestine
Year:  2019
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC/19/43.COM/7A,WHC/19/43.COM/INF.7.Rev.4
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Degradation of the architectural complex of the Church of the Nativity
States Parties:  Palestine
Year:  2018
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC/18/42.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Degradation of the architectural complex of the Church of the Nativity
States Parties:  Palestine
Year:  2017
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC/17/41.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Degradation of the architectural complex of the Church of the Nativity
Properties
Categories

Regions

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.