Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Asmara: A Modernist African City

Eritrea
Factors affecting the property in 2019*
  • Financial resources
  • Human resources
  • Management systems/ management plan
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
Factors identified at the time of inscription of the property:
  • Unfinalized Urban Conservation Master Plan and Asmara Planning Norms and Technical Regulations
  • Lack of strategies to ensure a steady influx of financial resources, substantial qualified human resources, and considerable institutional and technical capacity
  • Need to set up the central management body 
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2019

Total amount provided: USD 44,038 under the Netherlands Funds-in-Trust

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2019
Requests approved: 2 (from 2016-2018)
Total amount approved : 60,000 USD
Missions to the property until 2019**
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2019

On 28 November 2018, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1550/documents/ and reports the following:

  • The State Party has been working on the development of the Urban Conservation Master Plan (UCMP) and the Asmara Planning and Technical Regulation (APTR), which both are estimated to be finished by mid-2019;
  • The State Party has envisaged to develop a financial strategy and to create a Conservation Fund, in order to ensure the required funds for the conservation of the World Heritage property;
  • There is also an ongoing project, with funds from UNESCO and from the European Union Delegation in Eritrea, to improve capacities in the State Party for both conservation and management, and to undertake specific projects, including documentation of buildings, roads and open spaces within the property, which will serve as a baseline for the UCMP;
  • There are also ongoing capacity building activities, through a collaboration with the Politechnico di Milano, on conservation and management. Two courses took place in November–December 2017 and February 2019, including 60 participants from 16 institutions in the State Party;
  • Financial support from the Netherlands Funds-in-Trust to UNESCO has been received for the project “Conservation of Asmara: a modernist city in Africa”, which aims to build technical capacities of the World Heritage site management team, using the Historic Urban Landscape approach to finalize the UCMP and to develop strategies to ensure a steady influx of financial resources;
  • The Asmara Heritage Project is the institution with the mandate to coordinate the conservation and management of the World Heritage property;
  • 14 historical buildings have been identified as a priority for conservation and restoration and the report includes a table with a brief description of the buildings, the nature of the interventions required and a budget estimated for each intervention. In its report, the State Party commits to submitting details of planned conservation restoration projects for review by the Advisory Bodies before implementation.
Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2019

While progress has been made by the State Party, there is still a need to finalize the UCMP and the APTR, and to submit them both to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies.

The State Party has made significant efforts to obtain financial support for capacity building and for the development of the UCMP and for the APTR. However, there is a need to finalize a financial strategy for the property, and to establish the Conservation Fund, which was proposed in the State Party’s report, to secure the adequate flow of resources for the conservation and management of the property. There is also a need to continue capacity building, particularly for the long-term conservation, maintenance and monitoring of the property.

While the Asmara Heritage Project is the institution with the mandate to coordinate the conservation and management of the World Heritage property under the Department of Public Works Development, it is not clear how this institution will liaise and coordinate other aspects of urban planning and infrastructure in and around the property.

While it is appreciated that the State Party has already identified conservation priorities, the information submitted regarding the conservation and restoration works is insufficient to evaluate which criteria, methods, and materials will be used for the 14 historical buildings identified for phase 1.  A more thorough analysis of conservation needs is therefore required and details will need to be submitted for review by the Advisory Bodies, as proposed by the State Party and in line with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines, before implementation of any of these projects. In order to carry out the necessary technical assessment of the rehabilitation and conservation needs of the buildings, it is recommended that the State Party submit an International Assistance request to that effect.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2019
43 COM 7B.104
Asmara: A Modernist African City (Eritrea) (C 1550)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/19/43.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decision 41 COM 8B.11, adopted at its 41st session (Krakow, 2017),
  3. Commends the State Party for its commitment to address the concerns raised over the management requirements for the property;
  4. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party regarding the advances in the development of the Urban Conservation Master Plan (UCMP) and the Asmara Planning and Technical Regulation (APTR), as well as the timelines for their completion in 2019, and thanks the State Party of the Netherlands for offering financial support towards the finalization of these documents using the Historic Urban Landscape approach;
  5. Requests the State Party to finalize and submit to the World Heritage Centre both the UCMP and the APTR, for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  6. Also requests the State Party to:
    1. Urgently complete the issuing of the specific protective designations for the property, as previously requested and as per the provisions of the Eritrean Cultural and Natural Heritage Proclamation (2015), with an implementation calendar to monitor advancements in this regard,
    2. Finalize the financial strategy and establish the proposed Conservation Fund for the sustained conservation and management of the property, and for capacity building;
  7. Further requests the State Party to specify how the Asmara Heritage Project will act as a central management body for all aspects related with the property and will liaise and coordinate with other governmental authorities responsible for urban planning and development in and around the World Heritage property;
  8. Strongly invites the State Party to seek international financial and technical support towards the preparation of detailed conservation proposals, including criteria, methods and materials to be used for the conservation and restoration of the 14 historical buildings identified as an initial priority conservation and restoration phase and submit such proposals to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  9. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2020, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 45th session in 2021.
Draft Decision: 43 COM 7B.104

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/19/43.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decision 41 COM 8B.11, adopted at its 41st session (Krakow, 2017),
  3. Commends the State Party for its commitment to address the concerns raised over the management requirements for the property;
  4. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party regarding the advances in the development of the Urban Conservation Master Plan (UCMP) and the Asmara Planning and Technical Regulation (APTR), as well as the timelines for their completion in 2019, and thanks the State Party of the Netherlands for offering financial support towards the finalization of these documents using the Historic Urban Landscape approach;
  5. Requests the State Party to finalize and submit to the World Heritage Centre both the UCMP and the APTR, for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  6. Also requests the State Party to:
    1. Urgently complete the issuing of the specific protective designations for the property, as previously requested and as per the provisions of the Eritrean Cultural and Natural Heritage Proclamation (2015), with an implementation calendar to monitor advancements in this regard,
    2. Finalize the financial strategy and establish the proposed Conservation Fund for the sustained conservation and management of the property, and for capacity building;
  7. Further requests the State Party to specify how the Asmara Heritage Project will act as a central management body for all aspects related with the property and will liaise and coordinate with other governmental authorities responsible for urban planning and development in and around the World Heritage property;
  8. Strongly invites the State Party to seek international financial and technical support towards the preparation of detailed conservation proposals, including criteria, methods and materials to be used for the conservation and restoration of the 14 historical buildings identified as an initial priority conservation and restoration phase and submit such proposals to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  9. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2020, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 45th session in 2021.
Report year: 2019
Eritrea
Date of Inscription: 2017
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (ii)(iv)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2018) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 43COM (2019)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top