Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

Churches of Moldavia

Romania
Factors affecting the property in 1997*
International Assistance: requests for the property until 1997
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Missions to the property until 1997**
Information presented to the Bureau of the World Heritage Committee in 1997

The UNESCO/Japan Funds-in-Trust project 'International Support for the Restoration and Preservation of the Probota Monastery' is the first large-scale UNESCO cultural heritage project funded by the Japanese authorities. The project has a budget of US$ 515,280 and has a duration of two years. It is implemented by the Division for Cultural Heritage in collaboration with the Ministry of Culture of Romania and with the full support of the Romanian Orthodox Church. The first phase began in October 1996 and will be concluded in September 1997. The first progress report will be published in April 1997.

Action Required

The Bureau takes note of the initiation of the UNESCO/Japan Funds-in-Trust project 'International Support for the Restoration and Preservation of the Probota Monastery' and commends the authorities of Romania and Japan as well as UNESCO for their joint collaboration in this respect.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 1997
21 BUR IV.B.53
Churches of Moldavia (Romania)

The Bureau took note of the initiation of the UNESCO/Japan Funds-in-Trust project 'International Support for the Restoration and Preservation of the Probota Monastery' which is the first large-scale UNESCO cultural heritage project funded by the Japanese authorities outside Asia. It commended the authorities of Romania and Japan as well as UNESCO for their joint collaboration in this respect.

Report year: 1997
Romania
Date of Inscription: 1993
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (i)(iv)
Documents examined by the Committee
arrow_circle_right 21COM (1997)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top