Year of inscription on the World Heritage List 2004
Year(s) of inscription on the List of World Heritage in Danger 2004-present
Threats for which the property was inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger
Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger
See Decision 31 COM 7A. 22
Corrective measures identified
See Decision 31 COM 7A.22
Previous Committee Decisions see page https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1208/documents/
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved: USD 50,000
For details, see page https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1208/assistance/
UNESCO Extra-budgetary Funds
Total amount provided to the property: USD 568,000 (2004-2007) from the UNESCO-Japan Funds-in-Trust; USD 300,000 (2005-2008) from the UNESCO Italy Funds-in-Trust; USD 20,000 (2004) from the World Bank Italian Trust Funds.
Previous monitoring missions
Since January 2004: several UNESCO missions.
Factors affecting the property identified in previous reports
a) Lack of a comprehensive management plan;
b) The boundaries of the property inscribed on an emergency basis were not aligned with the written text of the original Nomination File;
c) Development pressure related to the post-disaster reconstruction process.
Illustrative material see page https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1208/
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2011
The State Party submitted a report on the state of conservation of the property on 31 January 2011. The report includes general information to substantiate the Statement of Outstanding Universal Value for the property. The reactive monitoring mission to the property, requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010) was not carried out due to unexpected last minute commitments by the State Party.
As for the actions implemented at the property in furtherance to the identified corrective measures, the State Party reports the following:
a) Management Plan and other planning tools
The Comprehensive Management Plan was adopted in 2010 by the Higher Council for Architecture and Urban development, as an annex to the Special Structural Master Plan of Bam. The comprehensive plan for the conservation of Bam Citadel was also updated and now includes precise actions for every sector of the Citadel, and has already been used to guide conservation actions throughout 2010. In addition, the comprehensive archaeological plan of the property, as well as the plan for the definition of it’s boundaries have been finalised. The report indicates that the plan for promotion and for tourism improvement has yet to be completed. To support the communication of results, professional seminars as well as Steering Committee meetings have taken place, with pending meetings with the Ministry of Housing to control construction works in Bam. The adoption of rules and regulations for Bam and its Cultural Landscape is still reported as pending. No precise timeframe has been provided for the expected completion of work.
b) Management arrangements and resources
The Safeguarding Unit and the Cultural Heritage Office (ICHHTO) have been established and are now staffed and resourced to ensure full operation, including the monitoring of sites throughout the property and the buffer zone. Migration from rural areas into the city has led to the increase in land price around the area and can constitute a threat to the existence of city gardens. ICHHTO has controlled this within the limits of the city and continues to supervise the surrounding areas prior to issuing permits.
Materials and equipment have been acquired but the State Party indicates that there is still a need to receive support to procure equipment for conservation interventions.
As for human resources, capacity building efforts, including training on interventions and archaeological works, have also continued to ensure the conservation of traditional know-how and therefore the long-term maintenance of the property.
c) Conservation of the property
Work has continued on the removal of debris, emergency stabilization and restoration of zones, focusing largely on the recovery of space for public use. These works have been fully documented and a unified monitoring system has been established to ensure compliance with developed standards for conservation. Research has also been carried out on water resources, urban plan development, documentation and preservation of archaeological findings.
Analysis and Conclusions of the World Heritage Centre, ICOMOS and ICCROM
The World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies note with satisfaction the sustained implementation of the corrective measures identified for the property and the progress made in the recovery of the historic area. They wish to underscore the importance of fully coordinating with the Ministry of Housing to ensure that construction works at Bam do not affect the attributes of the property and to control development in the surrounding areas, so that the landscape which supports the Outstanding Universal Value of the property is fully protected.
Decision Adopted: 35 COM 7A.26
The World Heritage Committee,
1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add,
2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.24, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010),
3. Takes note of the State Party's for its sustained commitment to the conservation and protection of the property and encourages it to continue its efforts, particularly in regard to the control of construction and protection of the landscape;
4. Also encourages the international community to continue supporting conservation works with the required technical expertise and funding;
5. Reiterates its request to invite a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission to the property to review the current state of conservation and to evaluate whether the Desired state of conservation has been achieved;
6. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre a progress report on the implementation of the correctives measures by 1 February 2012 for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 36th session in 2012;
7. Decides to retain Bam and its Cultural Landscape (Islamic Republic of Iran) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Decision Adopted: 35 COM 8C.2
The World Heritage Committee,
1. Following the examination of the state of conservation reports of properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger (WHC-11/35.COM/7A, WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add and WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add.Corr),
2. Decides to maintain the following properties on the List of World Heritage in Danger: