Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

Administration
Budget
Capacity Building
Communication
Community
Conservation
Credibility of the World Heritage ...
Inscriptions on the World Heritage ...
International Assistance
List of World Heritage in Danger
Operational Guidelines
Outstanding Universal Value
Partnerships
Periodic Reporting
Reinforced Monitoring
Reports
Tentative Lists
Working methods and tools
World Heritage Convention








250 Decisions
0 Resolutions
Session: 34COM 2010close
By Year
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.83 adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party on the implementation of the Management Plan including on interpretation and visitor management and welcomes the efforts made to improve conservation at the property; 4. Requests the State Party to provide to the World Heritage Centre clarification on: a) Whether or not a new site museum is envisaged and, in the affirmative, to provide details on its location and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Acknowledging the rapidly prepared and detailed information on the state of conservation of the property provided by the State Party at the request of the World Heritage Centre, 3. Considering the need to assess the full extent of the conservation issues referred to in a technical report submitted by the State Party, 4. Requests the State Party to invite a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission to assess the state of conservation of the property, review the recommendations of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.80, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Takes note with concern of the delays observed in the finalization of the management plan, due to the outstanding decision of the courts in the appeal case concerning competences and the new legal procedure linked to the Urban Development Plan; 4. Takes note with satisfaction of the entomological inventory of the property carried out in 2008 and requests the State Party to pursue the work targeted in this study, ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decisions 33 COM 7B.89 and 33 COM 7B.90, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes the considerable technical work involved in preparing and submitting the Visual Impact Study and that the authorities try to ensure compatibility of new architectural and facade design with the requirements of the protection of the World Heritage properties of the Historic Centre of Vienna and the Palace and Gardens of Schönbrunn; 4. Welcomes the commitment of the authorities of the City of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7A.25, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes with great concern that the State Party report indicates that demolitions and rebuilding are being approved without heritage impact assessments being undertaken to consider the impact on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; 4. Reiterates and extends its requests to the State Party to: a) Formally approve the Conservation Master Plan (CMP), integrate it within the Integrated Area Management Action Plan ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.93 adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the results of the joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission of February 2010; 4. Deeply regrets the demolition of the Eastern Gallery and its rebuilding without prior information being submitted to the World Heritage Centre, for review by the Advisory Bodies, in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines, 5. Requests the State Party to update the Management Plan clearly ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.94 adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Expresses its concern regarding the conclusions of the mission that indicate the gradual erosion of the attributes that convey the Outstanding Universal Value and, consequently, this erosion threatens the integrity of the property in terms of overall coherence and distinctiveness; 4. Strongly recommends to the State Party to implement the recommendations of the mission, in particular: a) Explore ways to list the property in ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.95, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Also recalling the results and recommendations of the reactive monitoring missions of 2006 and 2007 and the expert mission of 2008, 4. Notes that the monitoring activities for structural stability of the bridge are being implemented by the Municipality of Mostar; 5. Acknowledges the receipt of the drawings for the revised design for the Hotel Ruza; 6. Requests the State Party to revise the drawings to ensure that no ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Takes note of the detailed information provided by the State Party on the state of conservation of the property; 3. Expresses its deep concern regarding the overall state of conservation of the property, and in particular, serious changes due to unacceptable development of the urban fabric that are a threat to the Outstanding Universal Value, integrity and authenticity of the property; 4. Urges the State Party to immediately adopt all necessary measures aiming to ensure the safeguarding of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.96, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes the outcome of the World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission to the Historic Centre of Prague of January 2010; 4. Urges the State Party to implement the recommendations of the mission, particularly in relation to: a) The Blanka Tunnel: ensure the downgrading of the 'Eastern Highway, halt the proposed tunnel behind the national museum and remove the sections of the Eastern Highway from the Eastern edge ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Expresses its concern at the potential impact of wind turbines on the landscape setting of the property; 3. Requests the State Party to provide full details, including heights and location of turbines, of the approved projects and those pending approval, and of the delineation of the Zones for Wind Farm Development (ZDE), to the World Heritage Centre, for review by the Advisory Bodies; 4. Also requests the State Party to provide details of the impact assessments that have been carried out on wind farm ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Takes note of information provided by the State Party in response to concerns raised by the revision of the Architectural, Urban and Heritage Landscape Protection Zones (ZPPAUP); 3. Regrets the decision concerning the revision of the ZPPAUPs, despite the unfavorable advice of the competent regional services, thus weakening the protection of the entire property; 4. Requests the State Party to reconsider the decision concerning the revision of the ZPPAUPs in order to guarantee a satisfactory legal protection ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decisions 32 COM 7B.88, and 33 COM 7B.100 adopted at its 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) and 33rd (Seville, 2009) sessions respectively, 3. Takes note of the extensive and detailed observation, monitoring, analysis and research to develop an understanding of the complex micro-biological and climatic dynamics of the Lascaux cave as a means to fully understand the causes of the surface decay; 4. Welcomes the fact that during 2009, there were almost no adverse changes to the surface of the cave, but notes, ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.89 and 33 COM 7B.101, adopted at its 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) and 33rd (Seville, 2009) sessions respectively; 3. Notes the inauguration of the Bordeaux UNESCO Committee of experts in January 2009 to advise on all planning matters that might impact on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property, and that the State Party considers that this Committee completes the necessary range of instruments for the management of the overall property; 4. Also notes the consultative ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.104, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the receipt of the full Environmental Impact Assessment, the new Traffic Evaluation of bridge, tunnel and ferries and the Visual Impact Assessment supplied by the State Party; 4. Notes that: a) The Environmental Impact Assessment clearly demonstrates the overall sensitivity of the Rhine Valley landscape and the adverse impact that the proposed bridge would have on the cultural landscape, b) The traffic ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.103, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party on the "Bagrati Cathedral preliminary rehabilitation project", the general report on the studies conducted within the framework of this project and the "report on Bagrati Cathedral rehabilitation works"; 4. Notes the recommendations of the joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM advisory mission to the property; 5. Expresses its serious concern about irreversible ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.96, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Acknowledges the progress achieved through the development of the Skellig Michael Management Plan 2008-2018 prepared by the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, in conjunction with the Office of Public Works and following an extensive consultation process, that was formally submitted to the World Heritage Centre in July 2008; 4. Regrets that no substantial progress has been made in delivering a ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.109, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Takes note of the information provided by the State Party on actions taken to counter impacts of the ongoing A-31 Valdastico-South highway construction project on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; 4. Notes the measures taken by the State Party to amend the design of the highway and toll infrastructure in line with the recommendations of the joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS mission of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decisions 30 COM 7B.87, 31 COM 7B.114 and 32 COM 7B.98 adopted at its 30th (Vilnius, 2006), 31st (Christchurch, 2007) and 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) sessions respectively, 3. Welcomes the information that an "Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of the Republic of Lithuania on cooperation in pollution prevention of the Baltic Sea by oil and other harmful substances" was signed in October 2009 and that a "Joint Russian and Lithuanian Action Plan for Cooperation ...
Sites: Curonian Spit
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.116, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Commends the considerable improvement in institutional management arrangements, the conservation of buildings, fire protection measures and control of urban development achieved through the implementation of the first stage of the management plan 2005-2009; 4. Encourages the State Party to reconsider the proposals for a new garden between the Park of Pena and the Chalet of the Countess of Edla; 5. Also encourages the ...
top