World Heritage Centre https://whc.unesco.org?cid=305&l=en&search_theme=5&action=list&mode=rss World Heritage Centre - Committee Decisions 90 en Copyright 2024 UNESCO, World Heritage Centre Sun, 16 Jun 2024 08:27:56 EST UNESCO, World Heritage Centre - Decisions https://whc.unesco.org/document/logowhc.jpg https://whc.unesco.org 7 EXT.COM 5 First cycle of Periodic Reporting
  • Having examined Documents WHC-04/7EXT.COM/5A, WHC-04/7 EXT.COM/5B, WHC-04/7 EXT.COM/5C, WHC-04/7 EXT.COM/5D, and WHC-04/7 EXT.COM/5E,
  • Aware of the need to:
    1. study and reflect on the first cycle of Periodic Reporting;
    2. develop strategic direction on the forms and the format of the Periodic Reports, training priorities and international cooperation priorities; and
    3. to streamline the Committee's consideration of matters raised through Periodic Reporting relating to inscribed properties;
  • Decides to suspend for one year the commencement of the next cycle of Periodic Reporting.
    • ]]>     https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/40 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 06 Dec 2004 00:00:00 EST     7 EXT.COM 5A.1 Progress report on the preparation of the Periodic Report for Europe and North America The World Heritage Committee,

    1. Having examined Document WHC-04/7 EXT.COM/5A, 
    2. Recalling its Decision 25 COM VII.25-27 at its 25th session (Helsinki, 2001)  to examine at its 29th session (Durban, 2005), the Periodic Report for North America, 
    3. Notes the report on the progress of such Periodic Report.
    ]]>     https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/42 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 06 Dec 2004 00:00:00 EST     7 EXT.COM 5B Follow-up to Periodic Report for the Arab States The World Heritage Committee,

    1. Having examined Document WHC-04/7 EXT.COM/5B,
    2. Recalling its Decisions 24 COM VII.1-4 and 27 COM 20B.I, adopted at its 24th session (Cairns, 2000) and its 27th session (UNESCO, 2003), respectively,
    3. Takes note of the progress made in the implementation of the Regional Programme for the Arab States and in responding to the priority needs identified in the Periodic Report for the Arab States;
    4. Thanks the Dutch Government for supporting the publication of such Periodic Report;
    5. Requests the Director of the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies to continue developing the Assistance Modules, as well as projects, as part of the strategy outlined in the Regional Programme, and to consult the concerned States Parties in the process;
    6. Further requests the World Heritage Centre to report at its 30th session (2006) on the outcome of the Regional Meeting foreseen in 2005 – with particular attention to the review of the Assistance Modules and the mobilization of extra-budgetary resources for their implementation.
    ]]>     https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/45 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 06 Dec 2004 00:00:00 EST     7 EXT.COM 5C https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/49 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 06 Dec 2004 00:00:00 EST 7 EXT.COM 5D https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/50 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 06 Dec 2004 00:00:00 EST 7 EXT.COM 5E https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/48 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 06 Dec 2004 00:00:00 EST 7 EXT.COM 5E https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/51 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 06 Dec 2004 00:00:00 EST 7 EXT.COM 5F https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/52 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 06 Dec 2004 00:00:00 EST 8 COM XIII.37-38 Protection and Management of Properties Included on the World Heritage List: General Issues 37. The Secretariat informed the Committee of two activities being carried out since the sixth session concerning the management of cultural properties inscribed on the World Heritage List. One concerned the preparation of a "Handbook on Managing World Heritage" which deals with the preservation of these properties, ranging from general principles and legal considerations to practical means for carrying out a management programme. The outline was elaborated by an international group of experts during a meeting organised by ICCROM and ICOMOS in 1983 at the suggestion of the Secretariat.

    38. The Secretariat and ICOMOS have furthermore started to prepare new World Heritage nomination forms which would facilitate the protection and management of cultural sites once inscribed on the World Heritage List. There will be several types of these forms. It is foreseen to use different forms for individual monuments and for groups of monuments. For each of these categories there will be first of all a basic form or simplified nomination dossier, which will allow an appreciation of the value of the property and to decide whether it is justified to proceed with further study. There will also be a detailed form providing a comprehensive description of the property which is an indispensable pre-requisite for its nomination to the World Heritage List. This form will provide information on the condition of the property, the threats which it faces and the protection afforded. It will be possible to update this information and thereby follow any changes in the conservation status of the property. The Committee expressed its agreement with these two initiatives.

    ]]>     https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/3938 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 29 Oct 1984 00:00:00 EST     8 COM XIII.39 SOC: Western Tasmanian National Parks (Australia) 39. The Committee took note of document SC-84/CONF.004/7 in which the Australian authorities, at the request of the Bureau at its eighth session, submitted a brief commentary on the judgment of the High Court of Australia regarding Western Tasmanian National Parks. The Committee agreed that the Tasmanian case gave an example of the strength of the Convention, particularly for States Parties having a similar system of Federal Government. The Committee requested the Secretariat to distribute this document to all the other States Parties to the Convention.

    ]]>     https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/3939 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 29 Oct 1984 00:00:00 EST     8 COM XIII.40 State of Conservation on Four Natural Properties 40. The Representative of IUCN recalled that the Committee at its seventh session had encouraged the advisory non-governmental organisations to collect information through their contacts and to inform the Committee on the state of conservation of World Heritage properties. IUCN reported to the Committee on four natural properties as follows:

    a)    Simen National Park (Ethiopia)

    IUCN reported that the National Park personnel had apparently abandoned this park and that the area has been in the hands of armed groups. Although the group had informally assured IUCN that no damage had occurred in the park, however, IUCN still did not possess precise up-to-date information on the conservation status of this site. The Committee requested the Secretariat to invite the Ethiopian authorities to supply all possible information on the subject.

    b)   Mount Nimba (Guinea and Ivory Coast)

    IUCN recalled that the workshop supported by the World Heritage Fund to establish a research programme and an integrated management plan for this property had taken place at Mount Nimba in December 1983. The report of this workshop had stressed that the property is under severe pressure from poaching. The situation is further exacerbated by the lack of trained personnel and surveillance patrols. Considerable support had been already provided from the World Heritage Fund, including a financial contribution to the costs of constructing mountain, shelters for the patrols. The representative of Guinea agreed that the situation was critical and the Committee requested the Secretariat and the Chairman of the Committee to draw the Guinean authorities' attention to the need to ensure the protection of this World Heritage property.

    c)    Tai National Park (Ivory Coast)

    IUCN reported that this site was still under very serious threat due to poaching, gold prospection, tree-felling, and subsequent encroachment. The World Wildlife Fund had been discussing the means whereby international support could be raised to mitigate the situation. IUCN noted that unless conditions improved, this property might have to be recommended for inscription in the List of World Heritage in Danger. The Committee requested the Secretariat to draw the attention of the Ivory Coast authorities on the need to ensure the protection of this World Heritage property.

    d)    Durmitor National Park (Yugoslavia)

    IUCN informed the Committee. that, three of the republics of Yugoslavia planned to construct a hydro-electric dam which would flood a large part of the Tara River Canyon in Durmitor National park, and that the construction of a lead processing factory threatened to pollute the area. The observer from Yugoslavia confirmed that these threats still exist and that meetings were being held in Yugoslavia to try to resolve the problem. The Committee requested the Secretariat to invite the Yugoslav authorities to keep it informed of the situation and to report to the Bureau at its next session.

    ]]>     https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/3943 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 29 Oct 1984 00:00:00 EST     9 COM XIII.38-39 Monitoring of the State of Conservation of the World Heritage Properties: General Issues 38. The Committee thanked IUCN for these comprehensive reports and for regularly providing information on the status of natural properties. It furthermore welcomed the proposal of ICOMOS to submit similar reports, as far as its means would allow, in the near future.

    39. Finally, the Committee welcomed document SC-85/CONF.008/INF.2 reporting on the measures taken by Yugoslavia to implement the World Heritage Convention and encouraged other States Parties to prepare such national reports for submission to the Committee.

    ]]>     https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/3887 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 02 Dec 1985 00:00:00 EST     9 COM XIII.A SOC: Djoudj National Park (Senegal) Djoudj National Park, Senegal: The immediate situation of this Park, which is threatened by a large hydro-agricultural project, has been alleviated by the construction of a temporary canal. The longer term solutions were investigated by IUCN, Unesco, the Senegalese and Mauritanian authorities at a special workshop held in Senegal in July 1985. The main conclusions of this meeting included the agreement to establish the contiguous area to Djoudj in Mauritania known as Diawling as a national park and to eventually nominate this site with Djoudj as a transfrontier World Heritage property. Also, the completion of the Diama dam in 1986 would improve the water supply for Djoudj, although the effects of another dam, at Manatali, to be completed in 1989 were as yet unknown. IUCN indicated that, in the light of this favorable progress, Djoudj National Park could perhaps be removed from the List of World Heritage in Danger by 1987.

    ]]>     https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/3875 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 02 Dec 1985 00:00:00 EST     9 COM XIII.A SOC: Ngorongoro Conservation Area (Tanzania) Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania: The Tanzanian authorities had organised a commission of enquiry into the management of this property but as yet the conclusion had not yet been made known. However, with the financial support of NORAD (Norway), a major technical workshop was being held in December 1985 to study improving the management of this property. IUCN considered that this progress was positive and indicated that Ngorongoro could perhaps be removed from the List of World Heritage in Danger by 1987.

    ]]>     https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/3876 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 02 Dec 1985 00:00:00 EST     9 COM XIII.A SOC: Garamba National Park (Zaire) Garamba National Park, Zaire: The representative of Zaire, the President Delegate General of the Zaire Institute for the Conservation of Nature (IZCN), presented the Committee with an up-to-date report on the progress of work undertaken by IZCN and the consortium formed by Unesco-World Heritage, IUCN/WWF and the Frankfurt Zoological Society. The main objective of the project is to safeguard the population of endangered northern white rhinoceros in the park. The project was progressing well and the equipment provided with support of the World Heritage Fund had helped to strengthen the protection of this park. Indeed, there had been no deaths of rhinoceros reported since 1984 and two baby rhinoceroses had been born in May and June in 1985, bringing the population to 15 specimens. The representative of Zaire stressed his Government's commitment to this project, which, in particular, would enable the rhinoceros population to build up its numbers in its natural habitat. The Committee congratulated the Zairois authorities on their laudable efforts to ensure the success of this project and hoped that sufficient progress could eventually be made to remove Garamba National Park from the List of World Heritage in Danger.

    ]]>     https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/3877 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 02 Dec 1985 00:00:00 EST     9 COM XIII.B SOC: Tai National Park (Cote d'Ivoire) Tai National Park, Ivory Coast: IUCN reported that the situation had not improved since its reports of 1982 and 1984. The Secretariat had written to the Ivory Coast authorities indicating the possibility of nomination to the List of World Heritage in Danger but to date no response had been received. The Committee requested the Secretariat to continue its contacts and inform the Bureau of progress in this respect.

    ]]>     https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/3878 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 02 Dec 1985 00:00:00 EST     9 COM XIII.B SOC: Ichkeul National Park (Tunisia) Ichkeul National Park, Tunisia: The critical situation of this park, as reported to the Bureau at its 9th session had not altered and IUCN noted that if compensatory measures to re-establish the water regime of this Park were not taken very soon, the property would lose its international importance for migratory wildfowl. IUCN therefore strongly recommended the inclusion of this Park in the List of World Heritage in Danger. The Tunisian authorities had not responded to the Secretariat's request for further information, however, the representative of Tunisia informed the Committee that he would take up this matter at the highest level and he would inform the Secretariat and IUCN of the results of this enquiry.

    ]]>     https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/3879 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 02 Dec 1985 00:00:00 EST     9 COM XIII.C SOC: Los Glaciares (Argentina) Los Glaciares, Argentina: Part of this Park was being considered for re­appropriation for a settlement scheme by the Province of Santa Cruz and the second phase of this project could result in the excision of a further 20,000 ha which included an important habitat for the humeal deer. The Argentine representative confirmed this report and indicated that this problem was in fact of concern to the central government authorities, who wished to take this matter up with the Provincial Government. The Committee requested the Secretariat to contact the Argentine authorities to obtain more information on this matter.

    ]]>     https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/3880 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 02 Dec 1985 00:00:00 EST     9 COM XIII.C SOC: Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (Australia) Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, Australia: In reply to the Bureau's request for further information on the impacts of the construction of a road on the fringing reef adjacent to Cape Tribulation National Park, the Australian authorities had provided a comprehensive report which outlined a 3 year scientific research programme costing approximately 1 million $ to determine any short or possible long-term damage these reefs. The Committee expressed its satisfaction with this programme although it noted the comment by the IUCN representative that 3 years would be necessary before any conclusions could be reached. The representative of Australia indicated that it would inform the Committee at regular intervals on the progress and the results of this research programme.

    ]]>     https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/3881 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 02 Dec 1985 00:00:00 EST     9 COM XIII.C SOC: Pirin National Park (Bulgaria) Pirin National Park, Bulgaria: The construction of a hotel and a ski-resort at the head of the Vihren Valley within this Park was being undertaken, against strong opposition by local conservation groups. The representative of IUCN requested whether an environmental impact assessment had been made for these developments. The representative of Bulgaria confirmed these developments and informed the Committee that she would request the Pirin National Park authorities to provide a full report which she would transmit to the Bureau at its next session.

    ]]>     https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/3882 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 02 Dec 1985 00:00:00 EST