1. Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/8D,
2. Recalling Decision 38 COM 8D, adopted at its 38th session (Doha, 2014),
3. Acknowledges the excellent work accomplished by States Parties in the clarification of the boundaries of their World Heritage properties and commends them for their efforts to improve the credibility of the World Heritage List;
4. Recalls that the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies are not able to examine proposals for minor or significant modifications to boundaries of World Heritage properties whenever the delimitations of such properties as inscribed remain unclear;
5. Takes note of the clarifications of property boundaries and areas provided by the States Parties as presented in the annexes of Document WHC-15/39.COM/8D:

ASIA AND THE PACIFIC:

• Australia: Australian Fossil Mammal Sites (Riversleigh / Naracoorte);
• India: Humayun's Tomb, Delhi;

EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA:

• Azerbaijan: Walled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower;
• Canada: Historic District of Old Québec;
• Czech Republic: Tugendhat Villa in Brno;
• France: Gulf of Porto: Calanche of Piana, Gulf of Girolata, Scandola Reserve;
• Germany / United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Frontiers of the Roman Empire;
• Italy: City of Vicenza and the Palladian Villas of the Veneto; Costiera Amalfitana;
• Netherlands: Droogmakerij de Beemster (Beemster Polder); Mill Network at Kinderdijk-Elshout; Rietveld Schröderhuis (Rietveld Schröder House); Schokland and Surroundings;
• Spain: Historic Centre of Cordoba; Rock Art of the Mediterranean Basin on the Iberian Peninsula; University and Historic Precinct of Alcalá de Henares;
• United States of America: Monticello and the University of Virginia in Charlottesville;

LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARRIBBEAN:

• Brazil: Iguaçu National Park;
• Mexico: Agave Landscape and Ancient Industrial Facilities of Tequila; Luis Barragán House and Studio;

1. Having examined Document WHC/16/40.COM/8D,
2. Recalling Decision 39 COM 8D, adopted at its 39th session (Bonn, 2015),
3. Acknowledges the excellent work accomplished by States Parties in the clarification of the boundaries of their World Heritage properties and commends them for their efforts to improve the credibility of the World Heritage List;
4. Recalls that the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies are not able to examine proposals for minor or significant modifications to boundaries of World Heritage properties whenever the delimitations of such properties as inscribed remain unclear;
5. Takes note of the clarifications of property boundaries and areas provided by the States Parties as presented in the Annex of Document WHC/16/40.COM/8D:
   
   

   ARAB STATES

   • Syrian Arab Republic: Site of Palmyra;

   EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA

   • Canada: Dinosaur Provincial Park;
   • Croatia: Plitvice Lakes National Park;
   • Czech Republic: Holy Trinity Column in Olomouc; Litomyšl Castle;
   • France: Routes of Santiago de Compostela in France; Place Stanislas, Place de la Carrière and Place d'Alliance in Nancy;
   • Germany: Bauhaus and its Sites in Weimar and Dessau; Luther Memorials in Eisleben and Wittenberg;
   • Holy See: Vatican City;
   • Italy: City of Verona;
   • Russian Federation: Kremlin and Red Square, Moscow;
   • Spain: Cave of Altamira and Paleolithic Cave Art of Northern Spain; Las Médulas; La Lonja de la Seda de Valencia; San Millán Yuso and Suso Monasteries;
   • Sweden: Skogskyrkogården;
   • United States of America: La Fortaleza and San Juan National Historic Site in Puerto Rico; Cahokia Mounds State Historic Site; Chaco Culture;

   LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN

   • Belize: Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System;
   • Cuba: Old Havana and its Fortification System;
   • Mexico: Pre-Hispanic City of Teotihuacan;
   • Peru: Huascarán National Park;
   • Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of): Coro and its Port;
     
     
6. Requests the States Parties which have not yet answered the questions raised in the framework of the Retrospective Inventory to provide all clarifications and documentation as soon as possible, and by 1 December 2016 at the latest, for their subsequent examination, if the technical requirements are met, by the 41st session of the World Heritage Committee in 2017.

1. Having examined Document WHC/17/41.COM/8D,
2. Recalling Decision 40 COM 8D, adopted at its 40th session (Istanbul/UNESCO, 2016),
3. Acknowledges the excellent work accomplished by States Parties in the clarification of the boundaries of their World Heritage properties and commends them for their efforts to improve the credibility of the World Heritage List;
4. Recalls that the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies are not able to examine proposals for minor or significant modifications to boundaries of World Heritage properties whenever the delimitations of such properties as inscribed remain unclear;
5. Takes note of the clarifications of property boundaries and areas provided by the States Parties as presented in the Annex of Document WHC/17/41.COM/8D:
   

   AFRICA

   • Seychelles, Vallée de Mai Nature Reserve

   ARAB STATES

   • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Bosra

   EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA

   • Canada, Old Town Lunenburg
   • Russian Federation, Architectural Ensemble of the Trinity Sergius Lavra in Sergiev Posad
   • Sweden, Church Town of Gammelstad, Luleå
   • Sweden, Laponian Area
   • Sweden, Naval Port of Karlskrona

   LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN

   • Honduras, Maya Site of Copan;
     
     
6. Requests the States Parties which have not yet answered the questions raised in the framework of the Retrospective Inventory to provide all clarifications and documentation as soon as possible, and by 1 December 2017 at the latest, for their subsequent examination, if the technical requirements are met, at the 42nd session of the World Heritage Committee in 2018.

1. Having examined Document WHC/18/42.COM/8D,
2. Recalling Decision 41 COM 8D, adopted at its 41st session (Krakow, 2017),
3. Acknowledges the excellent work accomplished by States Parties in the clarification of the boundaries of their World Heritage properties and commends them for their efforts to improve the credibility of the World Heritage List;
4. Recalls that the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies are not able to examine proposals for minor or significant modifications to boundaries of World Heritage properties whenever the delimitations of such properties as inscribed remain unclear;
5. Takes note of the clarifications of property boundaries and areas provided by the States Parties as presented in the Annex of Document WHC/18/42.COM/8D:
   

   ARAB STATES

   • Libya, Archaeological Site of Cyrene
   • Libya, Archaeological Site of Leptis Magna
   • Libya, Archaeological Site of Sabratha
   • Libya, Old Town of Ghadamès
   • Libya, Rock-Art Sites of Tadrart Acacus

   EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA

   • Netherlands, Defence Line of Amsterdam
   • Spain, Ibiza, Biodiversity and Culture

   LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN

   • Haiti, National History Park – Citadel, Sans Souci, Ramiers
   • Mexico, Pre-Hispanic Town of Uxmal;
6. Requests the States Parties which have not yet answered the questions raised in the framework of the Retrospective Inventory to provide all clarifications and documentation as soon as possible, and by 1 December 2018 at the latest, for their subsequent examination, if the technical requirements are met, by the World Heritage Committee at its 43rd session in 2019.

1. Having examined Document WHC/19/43.COM/8D,
2. Recalling Decision 42 COM 8D, adopted at its 42nd session (Manama, 2018),
3. Acknowledges the excellent work accomplished by States Parties in the clarification of the boundaries of their World Heritage properties and commends them for their efforts to improve the credibility of the World Heritage List;
4. Recalls that the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies are not able to examine proposals for minor or significant modifications to boundaries of World Heritage properties whenever the delimitations of such properties as inscribed remain unclear;
5. Takes note of the clarifications of property boundaries and areas provided by the States Parties as presented in the Annex of Document WHC/19/43.COM/8D:
   
   

   ARAB STATES

   • Jordan, Quseir Amra

   ASIA AND THE PACIFIC

   • Kazakhstan, Mausoleum of Khoja Ahmed Yasawi

   EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA

   • Germany, Maulbronn Monastery Complex
   • Italy, Venice and its Lagoon
   • Russian Federation, Citadel, Ancient City and Fortress Buildings of Derbent
   LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN
   • Bolivia, City of Potosí
   • Ecuador, City of Quito
     
     
6. Requests the States Parties which have not yet answered the questions raised in the framework of the Retrospective Inventory to provide all clarifications and documentation as soon as possible, and by 1 December 2019 at the latest, for their subsequent examination, if the technical requirements are met, by the 44th session of the World Heritage Committee in 2020.