|Theme:||126.96.36.199 - Specific considerations related to criterion (vi)|
|Decision:||3 COM XII.46|
15.c) "[The World Heritage Committee encourages States Parties to] (…) be proactive in relation to development and conservation of World Heritage properties by conducting a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) at the time of nomination to anticipate the impact of any potential development on the Outstanding Universal Value."
|Theme:||188.8.131.52 - Impact assessment|
|Decision:||35 COM 12E|
|Theme:||2.4 - Upstream Process|
|Decision:||41 COM 9A|
|Theme:||2.7.1 - Cultural, Natural and Mixed Properties|
|Decision:||41 COM 9B|
"The World Heritage Committee, (…)
4. Encourages States Parties to integrate the notion of historic urban landscape in nomination proposals and in the elaboration of management plans of properties nominated for inscription on the World Heritage List;
5. Also encourages States Parties to integrate the principles expressed in the Vienna Memorandum into their heritage conservation policies;
6. Requests the Advisory Bodies and the World Heritage Centre to take into account the conservation of the historic urban landscape when reviewing any potential impact on the integrity of an existing World Heritage property, and during the nomination evaluation process of new sites."
|Theme:||184.108.40.206 - Historic Urban Landscapes|
|Decision:||29 COM 5D|
The World Heritage Policy Compendium was elaborated thanks to the generous contribution of the Government of Australia.
The World Heritage Policy Compendium On-line tool was developed thanks to the generous contribution of the Government of Korea.