The World Heritage Committee recommends providing a more detailed inventory of the attributes and elements of the property (based on Case law on decisions on Nominations).
|Theme:||2.2.4 - Integrity|
|See for examples Decisions:||32 COM 8B.28 33 COM 8B.32 34 COM 8B.20 34 COM 8B.11|
Synthesis based on relevant Committee decisions
The World Heritage Committee requests to ensure the management of a serial property as a unified whole, with an effective and explicit operational coordination between management plans existing for individual component parts of the site and the overall management plan for the property (based on case law on decisions on Nomination).
|Theme:||22.214.171.124 - Management systems|
|See for examples Decisions:||40 COM 8B.16 43 COM 8B.38 44 COM 8B.25 44 COM 8B.15|
15.c) "[The World Heritage Committee encourages States Parties to] (…) be proactive in relation to development and conservation of World Heritage properties by conducting a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) at the time of nomination to anticipate the impact of any potential development on the Outstanding Universal Value."
|Theme:||126.96.36.199 - Impact assessment|
|Decision:||35 COM 12E|
|Theme:||2.4 - Upstream Process|
|Decision:||41 COM 9A|
The World Heritage committee recommends addressing landscape surveys and the historic evolution of the landscape, as a holistic reflection of history and cultural traditions and of the interaction between culture and nature, including the way the landscape has been shaped by human practices and natural resources (based on Case law on decisions on Nominations).
|Theme:||188.8.131.52 - General|
|See for examples Decisions:||31 COM 8B.33 31 COM 8B.28|
The World Heritage Policy Compendium was elaborated thanks to the generous contribution of the Government of Australia.
The World Heritage Policy Compendium On-line tool was developed thanks to the generous contribution of the Government of Korea.