The World Heritage Committee recommends providing a more detailed inventory of the attributes and elements of the property (based on Case law on decisions on Nominations).
|Theme:||2.2.4 - Integrity|
|See for examples Decisions:||32 COM 8B.28 33 COM 8B.32 34 COM 8B.20 34 COM 8B.11|
Synthesis based on relevant Committee decisions
The World Heritage Committee requests to ensure the management of a serial property as a unified whole, with an effective and explicit operational coordination between management plans existing for individual component parts of the site and the overall management plan for the property (based on case law on decisions on Nomination).
|Theme:||188.8.131.52 - Management systems|
|See for examples Decisions:||40 COM 8B.16 43 COM 8B.38 44 COM 8B.25 44 COM 8B.15|
|Theme:||2.4 - Upstream Process|
|Decision:||41 COM 9A|
"The World Heritage Committee, (…)
4. Encourages States Parties to integrate the notion of historic urban landscape in nomination proposals and in the elaboration of management plans of properties nominated for inscription on the World Heritage List;
5. Also encourages States Parties to integrate the principles expressed in the Vienna Memorandum into their heritage conservation policies;
6. Requests the Advisory Bodies and the World Heritage Centre to take into account the conservation of the historic urban landscape when reviewing any potential impact on the integrity of an existing World Heritage property, and during the nomination evaluation process of new sites."
|Theme:||184.108.40.206 - Historic Urban Landscapes|
|Decision:||29 COM 5D|
The World Heritage Policy Compendium was elaborated thanks to the generous contribution of the Government of Australia.
The World Heritage Policy Compendium On-line tool was developed thanks to the generous contribution of the Government of Korea.