2 - Policies Regarding CREDIBILITY of the World Heritage List
Paragraph 132
3. Justification for Inscription
“[For a nomination to be considered as “complete”, the following requirements (see format in Annex 5) are to be met:] (…) In section 3.2, a comparative analysis of the property in relation to similar properties, whether or not on the World Heritage List, both at the national and international levels, shall be provided. The comparative analysis shall explain the importance of the nominated property in its national and international context.”
| Theme: | 2.6 - Comparative studies |
| Source: | OG Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention (WHC.19/01 - 10 July 2019) |
1
Extracts
0
Case laws
0
Decisions
0
Documents
Refine results by theme
The World Heritage Policy Compendium was elaborated thanks to the generous contribution of the Government of Australia.
The World Heritage Policy Compendium On-line tool was developed thanks to the generous contribution of the Government of Korea.
With the Support of
- The Convention
- Convention Text
- Operational Guidelines
- Policy Compendium
- Governing Bodies
- The General Assembly
- The Committee
- Resolutions / Decisions
- Sessions since 1977
- The States Parties
- The Centre
- Employment & Internships
- Who's Who
- Director of the World Heritage
- The Advisory Bodies
- Funding
- World Heritage Fund
- Financial regulations
- International Assistance
- Reporting & Monitoring
- State of Conservation
- Periodic Reporting
- List of factors affecting the properties
- Reactive Monitoring
- The Emblem
- Africa
- Arab States
- Asia & Pacific
- Europe & North America
- Latin America and the Caribbean