World Heritage Centre https://whc.unesco.org?cid=305&action=list&searchDecisions=&search_session_decision=43&mode=rss World Heritage Centre - Committee Decisions 90 en Copyright 2019 UNESCO, World Heritage Centre Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:03:02 EST UNESCO, World Heritage Centre - Decisions https://whc.unesco.org/document/logowhc.jpg https://whc.unesco.org 13 BUR IV.A.1 Ngorongoro Conservation Area (Tanzania) The Bureau was glad to learn that, thanks in part to support provided under the World Heritage Fund, the situation of this site had greatly improved. The Bureau re-considered this matter under the agenda item concerning nominations/exclusion from the List of World Heritage in Danger (see paragraph XI.28.C.).

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5302 wh-info@unesco.org Tue, 27 Jun 1989 00:00:00 EST
13 BUR IV.A.2 State of conservation 2) Garamba National Park (Zaire)

The joint project to rehabilitate this Park run by the Frankfurt Zoological Society/WWF/World Heritage Fund met with considerable success since no more rhinoceros have been poached in the last 5 years, the rhinoceros population has increased by 50% and a better management regime has been established. The Park recently celebrated the 50th anniversary since its foundation. The Bureau noted this situation with satisfaction and recommended that the property be re-examined in 1990: if the situation continued to show improvement, steps should be taken to initiate the removal of the site from the List of World Heritage in Danger.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5303 wh-info@unesco.org Tue, 27 Jun 1989 00:00:00 EST
13 BUR IV.B.3 Tai National Park (Cote d'Ivoire) The Bureau recalled that IUCN had reported on the deteriorating situation of this site on several occasions and that the Committee had requested the Ivoirian authorities to propose its inscription on the List of World Heritage in Danger. It noted that the Secretariat had contacted the Ivoirian authorities, but that only recently a response had been obtained in the form of a request for preparatory assistance in order to prepare a technical cooperation request for an integrated project addressing the need for increased protection of the natural values of this Park and also the socio-economic problems. The contribution of the World Heritage Fund would be used in a catalytic manner adding on to other funding sources such as UNDP. The Bureau requested the Secretariat to follow this matter and consult with IUCN in the preparation of the integrated project for technical cooperation.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5304 wh-info@unesco.org Tue, 27 Jun 1989 00:00:00 EST
13 BUR IV.B.4 Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal) The Bureau was informed of the project to construct a major highway across the Park, which would be financed by a number of Development Banks. Several impact studies - some contradictory in their conclusions - had been made: the Bureau expressed its preference for the alternative route outside of the Park to the North, which in addition to preserving the natural values of Niokolo-Koba, would serve to link up isolated villages. The Bureau requested the Secretariat to prepare a letter to the highest authority in Senegal recalling this State Party's obligation to protect the natural values for which Niokolo­Koba was inscribed on the World Heritage List and expressing the Bureau's strong preference for the alternative route outside the Park.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5305 wh-info@unesco.org Tue, 27 Jun 1989 00:00:00 EST
13 BUR IV.B.5 Mana Pools, Sani and Chewore Reserves (Zimbabwe) The Bureau wished firstly to commend the Zimbabwean authorities for their efforts to protect the remaining rhinoceros and elephant populations. The Bureau expressed great concern however over the proposed oil exploration programme, particularly in the light of a very negative report submitted to the Secretariat by the Zimbabwe National Commission for Unesco. The Bureau therefore requested the Secretariat to convey its concern to the highest government authorities of Zimbabwe, as well as to the Director of Mobil Oil Company.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5306 wh-info@unesco.org Tue, 27 Jun 1989 00:00:00 EST
13 BUR IV.B.6 Sangay National Park (Ecuador) The Bureau learnt of several threats to this site, including a proposal to excise a large section of land for settlement. The Bureau requested the Secretariat to contact the Ecuadorian authorities to express its concern over the proposed excision and to encourage them to draw up a request for technical cooperation to support the elaboration of a revised management plan addressing many of the conflicting issues in the Park. The Bureau hoped that the request for technical cooperation could be submitted in time for examination by the Committee in December 1989.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5307 wh-info@unesco.org Tue, 27 Jun 1989 00:00:00 EST
13 BUR IV.B.7 Iguazu National Park (Argentina) / Iguazu National Park (Brazil) The Bureau noted with satisfaction that the two States Parties had recently undertaken measures to coordinate the management and protection of these contiguous parks containing the famous waterfalls. In response to the suggestion of the IUCN representative to encourage the States Parties' acceptance to list these waterfalls under one name on the World Heritage List, the representative of Brazil stated that his government had not changed its position on this matter and that the two sites should continue to be indicated separately on the World Heritage List.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5308 wh-info@unesco.org Tue, 27 Jun 1989 00:00:00 EST
13 BUR IV.B.8 Mount Nimba (Côte d'Ivoire / Guinea) The Bureau noted that the preparatory assistance mission to this site in November 1988 had resulted in the elaboration of a two-year Unesco/UNDP project on evaluating the impact of iron-ore extraction on the natural values of the site and elaborating an integrated management plan which would improve protective measures and encourage socio-economic development of the transition zone. The Bureau nevertheless wished to express its concern about further damage to this site and suggested that this concern be communicated to the World Bank.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5309 wh-info@unesco.org Tue, 27 Jun 1989 00:00:00 EST
13 BUR IV.B.9 Yellowstone National Park (USA) Following a request of the Committee on 21 April 1989, the American authorities submitted a report on the fire management policy review and the recovery plan following the 1988 wildfires. The Bureau wished to thank the American authorities for this report and for their offer to make it available for other States Parties.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5310 wh-info@unesco.org Tue, 27 Jun 1989 00:00:00 EST
13 BUR IV.B.10 Manas Game Sanctuary (India) The Bureau noted that this site had recently been invaded by several hundreds of local people which had caused great damage to the park and the loss of several lives. The Indian authorities had sent in the police to halt further destruction, but the problem of illegal encroachment was still not resolved. The Bureau requested the Secretariat to contact the Indian authorities to express its concern over this situation and encourage taking appropriate measures to restore the site.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5311 wh-info@unesco.org Tue, 27 Jun 1989 00:00:00 EST
13 BUR IV.B.11 Wet Tropics of Queensland (Australia) The Bureau was informed by the representative of the Government of Australia of proceedings instituted against it before the Federal Court by the Government of Queensland with respect to the protection of the site of the Wet Tropics of Queensland inscribed on the World Heritage List in December 1988. The judge of the Federal Court is called upon to examine the question whether the ban decided by the Federal Government on commercial forestry operations in the site can reasonably be regarded as appropriate and adapted to the objectives of protecting, conserving, enhancing and rehabilitating the Wet Tropics of Queensland (World Heritage site).

The Federal Government of Australia wishes that Mr. James Thorsell ofIUCN, who led the evaluation of the site upon which the Committee based its decision to inscribe this site on the World Heritage List, give scientific and technical advice on the question brought before the Court. The Bureau considered that IUCN has a consultative role with respect to natural World Heritage sites. It would be concerned if scientific advice from this body could be interpreted as implicating the Committee in a national legal proceeding.

In the event that IUCN decides to give such advice, the Bureau wished to affirm that this advice should not be interpreted as a mandate from the Committee to justify the inscription of the site on the World Heritage List.

Furthermore, the Bureau expressed its concern about maintaining the integrity of the site.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5312 wh-info@unesco.org Tue, 27 Jun 1989 00:00:00 EST
13 BUR IV.B.12 State of conservation of other natural properties The IUCN representative also gave reports on the conservation status of Rio Platano (Honduras), Manu National Park (Peru), Ichkeul National Park (Tunisia), Sagarmatha (Nepal), Wood Buffalo National Park (Canada).

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5313 wh-info@unesco.org Tue, 27 Jun 1989 00:00:00 EST
13 BUR VI.14 Requests for International Assistance 14. The Bureau approved the following requests for international assistance for conducting regional training workshops in the field of natural heritage conservation and protected area management:

A. Qatar (for the Arab region), 7-20 October 1989 - US$30,000

B. College of African Wildlife Management, Mweka, United Republic of Tanzania (for anglophone African countries), in February 1990 - US$30,000

C. The Ministry of Nature Protection and the Department of National Parks, Senegal (for francophone African countries), in Dakar and Saint Louis, 30 October to 17 November 1989 - US$30,000

 

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/3568 wh-info@unesco.org Tue, 27 Jun 1989 00:00:00 EST
13 BUR VI.15 Requests for International Assistance 15. The Bureau reviewed another request from Tanzania, for the purchase of equipment for protecting the archaeological and palaeontological site of Olduvai Gorge in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area of the United Republic of Tanzania.

The Bureau, however, deferred its recommendations on this request, since the site had been inscribed on the World Heritage List under natural criteria. The Bureau, though, suggested that ICOMOS and the Secretariat provide further information on the relevance of cultural values for the inscription of this site on the World Heritage List at the forthcoming meeting of the Bureau and, subsequently, at the session of the Committee.

The Bureau also considered the desiderability of revising the criteria under which certain properties have previously been included, in order to determine whether other cultural or natural criteria did not also apply.

 

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/3570 wh-info@unesco.org Tue, 27 Jun 1989 00:00:00 EST
13 BUR VI.16 Requests for International Assistance 16. The Bureau heard details of an application for technical assistance amounting to about US$320,000 submitted by the Syrian Arab Republic for a conservation programme for the Old City of Aleppo. The Bureau agreed to grant the Syrian authorities preparatory assistance to enable them to draw up a large-scale project for submission to funding sources other than the World Heritage Fund, the resources of which were too limited to take on such a project.

 

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/3571 wh-info@unesco.org Tue, 27 Jun 1989 00:00:00 EST
13 BUR IX.D.26 Nominations to the List of World Heritage in Danger 26. The Bureau considered that, if the Government of Mali so wished, a preparatory assistance mission could be organized with a view to helping the authorities concerned to work out an appropriate nomination file on Timbuktu (mosques, cemeteries and mausoleums) to the List of World Heritage in Danger. This nomination file could be presented to one of the next sessions of the Bureau.

 

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/3976 wh-info@unesco.org Tue, 27 Jun 1989 00:00:00 EST