State of Conservation (SOC)

• Acropolis, Athens (2004)
  Greece
  Year: 2004
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
  

• Aksum (2005)
  Ethiopia
  Year: 2005
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Other Threats: Lack of documentation and equipment
  Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
  

• Angkor (2006)
  Cambodia
  Year: 2006
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
  

• Archaeological Site of Cyrene (2011)
  Libya
  Year: 2011
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
  

• Archaeological Site of Cyrene (2010)
  Libya
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Other Threats: f) Inadequate on-site security and control systems
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
  

• Archaeological Site of Cyrene (2009)
  Libya
  Year: 2009
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Other Threats: Inadequate on-site security and control systems
  Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
  

• Archaeological Site of Cyrene (2007)
  Libya
  Year: 2007
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
  

• Archaeological Site of Cyrene (2006)
  Libya
  Year: 2006
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Other Threats: Lack of maintenance, insufficient guardianship and control system inside and outside the archaeological area
  Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add
  

• Archaeological Site of Volubilis (2007)
  Morocco
  Year: 2007
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
  

• Archaeological Site of Volubilis (2005)
  Morocco
  Year: 2005
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Other Threats: Need to preserve the landscape
  Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
  

• Borobudur Temple Compounds (2005)
  Indonesia
  Year: 2005
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Other Threats: Uncontrolled vendors within and around the property
  Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
  

• Borobudur Temple Compounds (2004)
  Indonesia
  Year: 2004
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
  

• Butrint (2004)
  Albania
  Year: 2004
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Danger List: Yes
  Other Threats: a) Lack of adequate protection and conservation of the site; b) Serious deterioration of materials resulting in an important loss of cultural significance
  Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
  

• City of Bath (2009)
  United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  Year: 2009
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
  

• Classical Gardens of Suzhou (2004)
  China
  Year: 2004
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
  

• Colonial City of Santo Domingo (2011)
  Dominican Republic
  Year: 2011
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
  

• Colonial City of Santo Domingo (2010)
  Dominican Republic
  Year: 2010
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
  

• Colonial City of Santo Domingo (2009)
  Dominican Republic
  Year: 2009
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
  

• Colonial City of Santo Domingo (2007)
  Dominican Republic
  Year: 2007
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Other Threats: Deterioration of structures caused by natural and human hazards
  Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
  

• Colonial City of Santo Domingo (2006)
  Dominican Republic
  Year: 2006
  Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities,
  Other Threats: Deterioration of structures caused by natural and human hazards
  Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
  

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.