State of Conservation
30
Reports
30
Properties concerned
24
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2001close
Date end:2001close
| States Parties: |
 Egypt
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Risk of collapse |
| States Parties: |
 Mauritania
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Nepal
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Germany
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Cameroon
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Spain
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Decline of the Iberian lynx and Imperial eagle populations |
| States Parties: |
 Pakistan
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Russian Federation
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Australia
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 India
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Viet Nam
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Rapid economic development |
| States Parties: |
 Peru
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Peru
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Brazil
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Egypt
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stones |
| States Parties: |
 Dominica
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 United Republic of Tanzania
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Senegal
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.7,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Germany
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Impact of the Havel waterway improvement project on the cultural landscape |
States Parties
Australia Brazil Cameroon Côte d'Ivoire Dominica Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia Germany Guinea Honduras India Jordan Mauritania Nepal Pakistan Peru Russian Federation Senegal Spain United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Viet Nam
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
