State of Conservation (SOC)
Exports
By Year
Properties by Region
Properties by Category
-
Bahla Fort (1988)
Oman
Year: 1988
Threats*:
Other Threats: Degradation of the structures
Document Source: SC.88/CONF.007/05,SC.88/CONF.001/08
-
Djoudj National Bird Sanctuary (1988)
Senegal
Year: 1988
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan Water (rain/water table) Water infrastructure
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: SC.88/CONF.001/04A
-
Göreme National Park and the Rock Sites of Cappadocia (1988)
Turkey
Year: 1988
Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
Document Source: SC.88/CONF.001/13
-
Historic District of Old Québec (1988)
Canada
Year: 1988
Threats*: Housing
Document Source: SC.88/CONF.001/13
-
Manú National Park (1988)
Peru
Year: 1988
Threats*: Oil and gas
Document Source: SC.88/CONF.001/04A
-
Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1988)
Tanzania, United Republic of
Year: 1988
Threats*: Financial resources Management systems/ management plan
Danger List: Yes
Document Source: SC.88/CONF.001/04A
-
Niokolo-Koba National Park (1988)
Senegal
Year: 1988
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Illegal activities Management systems/ management plan
Document Source: SC.88/CONF.001/04A
-
Río Plátano Biosphere Reserve (1988)
Honduras
Year: 1988
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Document Source: SC.88/CONF.001/13
-
Studenica Monastery (1988)
Serbia
Year: 1988
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Document Source: SC.88/CONF.001/13
-
Taï National Park (1988)
Côte d'Ivoire
Year: 1988
Threats*: Crop production Illegal activities Mining
Document Source: SC.88/CONF.001/04A
-
Wieliczka Salt Mine (1988)
Poland
Year: 1988
Threats*: Relative humidity Water (rain/water table)
Other Threats: Gradual degradation
Document Source: SC.88/CONF.007/05,SC.88/CONF.001/08
-
Yellowstone National Park (1988)
United States of America
Year: 1988
Threats*:
Other Threats: Fire
Document Source: SC.88/CONF.001/13
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
