i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2001close
Date end:2001close
Threats* : Interpretative and visitation facilitiesclose
States Parties: Poland
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.6,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Australia
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: China
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Lack of maintenance ; Industrial pollution
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Risks of collapse
States Parties: Australia
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Australia
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.