i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

13
Reports
13
Properties concerned
13
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 1985close
Date end:1985close
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
djoudj national bird sanctuaryDjoudj National Bird Sanctuary senegal Senegal 1985 Water (rain/water table), Water infrastructure, Yes
durmitor national parkDurmitor National Park montenegro Montenegro 1985 Water infrastructure, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 1985
Other Threats: Fire
 No
garamba national parkGaramba National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 1985 Illegal activities, Yes
great barrier reefGreat Barrier Reef australia Australia 1985 Ground transport infrastructure, No
ichkeul national parkIchkeul National Park tunisia Tunisia 1985 Air pollution, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Subsistence hunting, Water (rain/water table), Water infrastructure, No
los glaciares national parkLos Glaciares National Park argentina Argentina 1985 Housing, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Land conversion, No
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 1985 Management systems/ management plan, Yes
pirin national parkPirin National Park bulgaria Bulgaria 1985 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
royal palaces of abomeyRoyal Palaces of Abomey benin Benin 1985 Storms, No
simien national parkSimien National Park ethiopia Ethiopia 1985 Civil unrest, No
tai national parkTaï National Park cote d'ivoire Côte d'Ivoire 1985 Crop production, Illegal activities, Mining, No
wood buffalo national parkWood Buffalo National Park canada Canada 1985 Water infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.