State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
51
Reports
51
Properties
41
States Parties
States Parties:  Ethiopia
Year:  1992
Document Source:  CLT.92/CONF.003/03,WHC.92/CONF.002/05
Threats*: Civil unrest
States Parties:  Bulgaria
Year:  1992
Document Source:  CLT.92/CONF.003/03,WHC.92/CONF.002/05,WHC.92/CONF.002/07 Rev
Threats*: Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals Surface water pollution Water (extraction) Water infrastructure
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
States Parties:  United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year:  1992
Document Source:  WHC.92/CONF.002/05
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Costa Rica
Panama
Year:  1992
Document Source:  CLT.92/CONF.003/03,WHC.92/CONF.002/05
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Management systems/ management plan Oil and gas
States Parties:  New Zealand
Year:  1992
Document Source:  WHC.92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Major linear utilities Water (extraction) Water infrastructure
States Parties:  Algeria
Year:  1992
Document Source:  WHC.92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Earthquake
States Parties:  Madagascar
Year:  1992
Document Source:  WHC.92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Financial resources Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Lebanon
Year:  1992
Document Source:  WHC.92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Housing Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Holy See
Year:  1992
Document Source:  WHC.92/CONF.002/05
Threats*: Housing
States Parties:  Australia
Year:  1992
Document Source:  CLT.92/CONF.003/03,WHC.92/CONF.002/05
Threats*: Financial resources Management systems/ management plan Water infrastructure
States Parties:  Canada
Year:  1992
Document Source:  CLT.92/CONF.003/03,WHC.92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Forestry /wood production Localised utilities Water infrastructure
Other Threats: Bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis
Properties
Categories

Regions


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.