State of Conservation (SOC)

Results

200 SOC reports
101 Property(ies)
58 States Parties
Date end: 1992

By Year
Properties by Region
Properties by Category
 Previous page  1  ...  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  See All
  • Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1985)
    Tanzania, United Republic of
    Year: 1985
    Threats*: Management systems/ management plan,
    Danger List: Yes
    Document Source: SC.85/CONF.008/09

  • Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1984)
    Tanzania, United Republic of
    Year: 1984
    Threats*: Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: SC.84/CONF.001/04,SC.84/CONF.004/04

  • Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1983)
    Tanzania, United Republic of
    Year: 1983
    Threats*: Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: SC.83/CONF.009/8

  • Niokolo-Koba National Park (1992)
    Senegal
    Year: 1992
    Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: CLT.92/CONF.003/03,WHC.92/CONF.002/05

  • Niokolo-Koba National Park (1990)
    Senegal
    Year: 1990
    Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: CC.90/CONF.003/03,CC.90/CONF.004/04

  • Niokolo-Koba National Park (1989)
    Senegal
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05

  • Niokolo-Koba National Park (1988)
    Senegal
    Year: 1988
    Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: SC.88/CONF.001/04A

  • Niokolo-Koba National Park (1987)
    Senegal
    Year: 1987
    Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: SC.87/CONF.005/INF.1

  • Niokolo-Koba National Park (1986)
    Senegal
    Year: 1986
    Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities,
    Document Source: CC.86/CONF.003/INF.4,CC.86/CONF.001/11

  • Old City of Dubrovnik (1992)
    Croatia
    Year: 1992
    Threats*: War, Management systems/ management plan,
    Danger List: Yes
    Document Source: CLT.92/CONF.003/02,WHC.92/CONF.002/05

  • Old City of Dubrovnik (1991)
    Croatia
    Year: 1991
    Threats*: War,
    Document Source: SC.91/CONF.002/15

  • Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls (1982)
    Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
    Year: 1982
    Threats*: Housing, Deliberate destruction of heritage, Legal framework, Management systems/ management plan,
    Other Threats: Loss of historical authenticity
    Document Source: CLT.82/CONF.014/03,CLT.82/CONF.014/06

  • Old City of Sana'a (1991)
    Yemen
    Year: 1991
    Threats*: Housing,
    Other Threats: Increasing number of dilapidated buildings
    Document Source: SC.91/CONF.002/03

  • Old City of Sana'a (1990)
    Yemen
    Year: 1990
    Threats*: Housing,
    Other Threats: Increasing number of dilapidated buildings
    Document Source: CC.90/CONF.004/03

  • Old Walled City of Shibam (1991)
    Yemen
    Year: 1991
    Threats*: Flooding,
    Other Threats: Poor maintenance
    Document Source: SC.91/CONF.002/03

  • Olympic National Park (1992)
    United States of America
    Year: 1992
    Threats*: Pollution of marine waters,
    Document Source: WHC.92/CONF.002/12

  • Olympic National Park (1991)
    United States of America
    Year: 1991
    Threats*: Pollution of marine waters,
    Document Source: SC.91/CONF.002/15

  • Olympic National Park (1990)
    United States of America
    Year: 1990
    Threats*: Pollution of marine waters,
    Document Source: CC.90/CONF.004/04

  • Palace and Park of Versailles (1989)
    France
    Year: 1989
    Threats*: Management systems/ management plan,
    Document Source: SC.89/CONF.004/12

  • Paris, Banks of the Seine (1992)
    France
    Year: 1992
    Threats*: Housing,
    Document Source: WHC.92/CONF.002/12

 Previous page  1  ...  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  See All


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.