i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

104
Reports
104
Properties concerned
72
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2009close
Date end:2009close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
Virgin Komi Forests (2009)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Vredefort Dome (2009)
States Parties: South Africa
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Walled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower (2009)
States Parties: Azerbaijan
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
Western Caucasus (2009)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Algeria Austria Azerbaijan Bangladesh Belarus Brazil Bulgaria Cambodia Cameroon Chile China Colombia Côte d'Ivoire Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Estonia Ethiopia France Georgia Guinea Honduras Hungary India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Iraq Italy Jordan Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Libya Lithuania Malaysia Mali Malta Mauritania Mexico Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Nepal Niger Oman Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Russian Federation Senegal Serbia South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye Turkmenistan Uganda Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania Uruguay Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Viet Nam Yemen
Threats
Management systems/ management plan 104

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.