Advanced search

State of Conservation (SOC)

Results

9 SOC reports
2 Property(ies)
1 States Parties
States Parties: Cambodia,

Exports

 Table View
 List view
 Statistics
 Excel file

By Year
Properties by Region
Properties by Category

  • Angkor (2010)
    Cambodia
    Year: 2010
    Threats*: Housing Management systems/ management plan
    Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add

  • Angkor (2008)
    Cambodia
    Year: 2008
    Threats*: Housing Management systems/ management plan
    Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B

  • Angkor (2006)
    Cambodia
    Year: 2006
    Threats*: Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation Interpretative and visitation facilities Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
    Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B

  • Angkor (2004)
    Cambodia
    Year: 2004
    Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage Illegal activities Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
    Danger List: Yes
    Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev

  • Angkor (1994)
    Cambodia
    Year: 1994
    Threats*: Human resources Legal framework Management systems/ management plan
    Danger List: Yes
    Other Threats: Urgent problems of conservation
    Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/06

  • Angkor (1993)
    Cambodia
    Year: 1993
    Threats*: Human resources Legal framework Management systems/ management plan
    Danger List: Yes
    Other Threats: Urgent problems of conservation
    Document Source: WHC.93/CONF.001/03,WHC.93/CONF.002/05

  • Temple of Preah Vihear (2011)
    Cambodia
    Year: 2011
    Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
    Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add.2

  • Temple of Preah Vihear (2010)
    Cambodia
    Year: 2010
    Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
    Document Source: 

  • Temple of Preah Vihear (2009)
    Cambodia
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.