i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2006close
Date end:2006close
Threats* : Water infrastructureclose
Ashur (Qal'at Sherqat) (2006)
States Parties: Iraq
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Other Threats: Fragile mud brick structures
Danger List:  Yes
Durmitor National Park (2006)
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Everglades National Park (2006)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
Ichkeul National Park (2006)
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
Iguaçu National Park (2006)
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Keoladeo National Park (2006)
States Parties: India
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Río Plátano Biosphere Reserve (2006)
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
Serengeti National Park (2006)
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Three Parallel Rivers of Yunnan Protected Areas (2006)
States Parties: China
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Brazil China Honduras India Iraq Montenegro Tunisia United Republic of Tanzania United States of America
Threats
Water infrastructure 9

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.