State of Conservation (SOC)
Los Glaciares National Park (1985)
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds
International Assistance granted to the property
Requests Approved: 0
(from1985-1985)
Total Amount Ap proved: 5,000USD
| 1985 | Support to preparation of interpretative signs for Los Glaciares ... | 5,000 USD |
Missions**
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
Corrective Measures
Current conservation issues
[Oral report]
Part of this Park was being considered for reappropriation for a settlement scheme by the Province of Santa Cruz and the second phase of this project could result in the excision of a further 20,000 ha which included an important habitat for the humeal deer.
The Argentine representative confirmed this report and indicated that this problem was in fact of concern to the central government authorities, who wished to take this matter up with the Provincial Government.
Conclusion
The Committee requested the Secretariat to contact the Argentine authorities to obtain more information this matter.
Decision
09COMXIII.C
Link to the decision
Los Glaciares, Argentina: Part of this Park was being considered for reappropriation for a settlement scheme by the Province of Santa Cruz and the second phase of this project could result in the excision of a further 20,000 ha which included an important habitat for the humeal deer. The Argentine representative confirmed this report and indicated that this problem was in fact of concern to the central government authorities, who wished to take this matter up with the Provincial Government. The Committee requested the Secretariat to contact the Argentine authorities to obtain more information on this matter.
No draft decision proposed
Los Glaciares National Park
ArgentinaExports
Threats*
- Housing
- Land conversion
- Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
- Other Threats:
Documents
SC.85/CONF.008/09Other Documents:
View inscribed site documents, nomination file, reports, decisions, ...SOC ID: 1538
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
