State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
46
Reports
14
Properties
13
States Parties
 1 2 3  See All
States Parties:  Peru
Year:  2003
Document Source:  WHC.03/27.COM/07B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2017
Document Source:  WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2016
Document Source:  WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2014
Document Source:  WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Ecuador
Year:  2013
Document Source:  WHC-13/37.COM/7B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Dominican Republic
Year:  2016
Document Source:  WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Dominican Republic
Year:  2014
Document Source:  WHC-14/38.COM/7B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Pakistan
Year:  2017
Document Source:  WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add2
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Pakistan
Year:  2016
Document Source:  WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Turkey
Year:  2017
Document Source:  WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas); Land Reclamation project
States Parties:  Turkey
Year:  2015
Document Source: 
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas); Land Reclamation project
States Parties:  Turkey
Year:  2013
Document Source:  WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas); Land Reclamation project
States Parties:  Turkey
Year:  2012
Document Source:  WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas)
States Parties:  Turkey
Year:  2011
Document Source:  WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: a) Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas);
States Parties:  Turkey
Year:  2010
Document Source:  WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: a) Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas);
States Parties:  Turkey
Year:  2003
Document Source:  WHC.03/27.COM/07B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Need to monitor movements which could affect the structure of the building
States Parties:  Turkey
Year:  2000
Document Source:  WHC.00/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Need to monitor movements which could affect the structure of the building
States Parties:  Czechia
Year:  2011
Document Source:  WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Mexico
Year:  2011
Document Source:  WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Mexico
Year:  2004
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
 1 2 3  See All


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.