Advanced search

State of Conservation (SOC)

Results

27 SOC reports
4 Property(ies)
1 States Parties
States Parties: Ethiopia,

Exports

 Table View
 List view
 Statistics
 Excel file

By Year
Properties by Region
Properties by Category
 Previous page  1  2  See All

  • Simien National Park (2006)
    Ethiopia
    Year: 2006
    Threats*: Crop production Ground transport infrastructure Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community Land conversion Livestock farming/grazing of domesticated animals
    Danger List: Yes
    Other Threats: Declining populations of the Walia ibex, Simien fox and other large mammal species
    Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A

  • Simien National Park (2005)
    Ethiopia
    Year: 2005
    Threats*: Crop production Ground transport infrastructure Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community Illegal activities Land conversion
    Danger List: Yes
    Other Threats: Declining populations of Walia ibex and Simien FoxSoil deterioration.
    Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A

  • Simien National Park (2004)
    Ethiopia
    Year: 2004
    Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community Management systems/ management plan
    Danger List: Yes
    Other Threats: Decreasing population of Walia Ibex and Simien Fox
    Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev

  • Simien National Park (1992)
    Ethiopia
    Year: 1992
    Threats*: Civil unrest
    Document Source: CLT.92/CONF.003/03,WHC.92/CONF.002/05

  • Simien National Park (1991)
    Ethiopia
    Year: 1991
    Threats*: Civil unrest
    Document Source: SC.91/CONF.002/04 Add

  • Simien National Park (1985)
    Ethiopia
    Year: 1985
    Threats*: Civil unrest
    Document Source: SC.85/CONF.008/09

  • Simien National Park (1984)
    Ethiopia
    Year: 1984
    Threats*: War
    Document Source: SC.84/CONF.004/09

 Previous page  1  2  See All

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.