State of Conservation (SOC)

Results

15 SOC reports
3 Property(ies)
1 States Parties
States Parties: Uzbekistan,

By Year
Properties by Region
Properties by Category
  • Historic Centre of Bukhara (2013)
    Uzbekistan
    Year: 2013
    Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Management activities Management systems/ management plan Solid waste
    Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add

  • Historic Centre of Bukhara (2011)
    Uzbekistan
    Year: 2011
    Threats*: Earthquake Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Financial resources Human resources Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community Localised utilities Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure Management activities Management systems/ management plan Solid waste
    Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add

  • Historic Centre of Bukhara (2010)
    Uzbekistan
    Year: 2010
    Threats*: Air pollution Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure Management activities Management systems/ management plan Solid waste
    Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B

  • Historic Centre of Shakhrisyabz (2007)
    Uzbekistan
    Year: 2007
    Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
    Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B

  • Historic Centre of Shakhrisyabz (2006)
    Uzbekistan
    Year: 2006
    Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
    Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B

  • Historic Centre of Shakhrisyabz (2005)
    Uzbekistan
    Year: 2005
    Threats*: Earthquake Legal framework Management systems/ management plan
    Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev

  • Historic Centre of Shakhrisyabz (2004)
    Uzbekistan
    Year: 2004
    Threats*: Earthquake Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation Legal framework Management systems/ management plan Relative humidity Water (rain/water table)
    Other Threats: Extensive cracks and leaning walls
    Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B

  • Samarkand – Crossroad of Cultures (2013)
    Uzbekistan
    Year: 2013
    Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Management systems/ management plan
    Other Threats: Conservation of urban fabric
    Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B

  • Samarkand – Crossroad of Cultures (2012)
    Uzbekistan
    Year: 2012
    Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Management systems/ management plan
    Other Threats: Conservation of urban fabric
    Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B

  • Samarkand – Crossroad of Cultures (2011)
    Uzbekistan
    Year: 2011
    Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Management systems/ management plan
    Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B

  • Samarkand – Crossroad of Cultures (2009)
    Uzbekistan
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage Ground transport infrastructure Housing Management activities
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add

  • Samarkand – Crossroad of Cultures (2008)
    Uzbekistan
    Year: 2008
    Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage Ground transport infrastructure Housing Management activities
    Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B

  • Samarkand – Crossroad of Cultures (2007)
    Uzbekistan
    Year: 2007
    Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Management activities
    Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add

  • Samarkand – Crossroad of Cultures (2006)
    Uzbekistan
    Year: 2006
    Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Management activities
    Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B

  • Samarkand – Crossroad of Cultures (2005)
    Uzbekistan
    Year: 2005
    Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage Ground transport infrastructure High impact research/monitoring activities Management activities
    Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev



* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.