jump to the content

State of Conservation (SOC)

Results

180 SOC reports
66 Property(ies)
44 States Parties
Threats* : Financial resources,

By Year
Properties by Region
Properties by Category
 Previous page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  ...  9  See All
  • Iguaçu National Park (2007)
    Brazil
    Year: 2007
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B

  • Iguaçu National Park (2006)
    Brazil
    Year: 2006
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B

  • Iguazu National Park (2012)
    Argentina
    Year: 2012
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add

  • Iguazu National Park (2010)
    Argentina
    Year: 2010
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add

  • Iguazu National Park (2008)
    Argentina
    Year: 2008
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add

  • Iguazu National Park (2007)
    Argentina
    Year: 2007
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B

  • Island of Mozambique (2012)
    Mozambique
    Year: 2012
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Other Threats: b) Growing number of collapsed or seriously dilapidated buildings;
    Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add

  • Island of Mozambique (2010)
    Mozambique
    Year: 2010
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Other Threats: b) Growing number of collapsed or seriously dilapidated buildings;
    Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add.2

  • Island of Mozambique (2010)
    Mozambique
    Year: 2010
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Other Threats: b) Growing number of collapsed or seriously dilapidated buildings
    Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add.2

  • Island of Mozambique (2009)
    Mozambique
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Other Threats: Growing number of collapsed or seriously dilapidated buildings;
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add

  • Island of Mozambique (1994)
    Mozambique
    Year: 1994
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Other Threats: Precarious state of conservation of the stone
    Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/16

  • Kathmandu Valley  (1993)
    Nepal
    Year: 1993
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
    Document Source: WHC.93/CONF.001/03,WHC.93/CONF.002/05

  • Kathmandu Valley  (1992)
    Nepal
    Year: 1992
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
    Document Source: WHC.92/CONF.002/12

  • Kaziranga National Park (2011)
    India
    Year: 2011
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add

  • Kaziranga National Park (2009)
    India
    Year: 2009
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add

  • Kaziranga National Park (2008)
    India
    Year: 2008
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Other Threats: Insufficient infrastructure
    Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B

  • Kizhi Pogost (2004)
    Russian Federation
    Year: 2004
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Other Threats: Fragile wooden heritage
    Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B

  • Kizhi Pogost (1994)
    Russian Federation
    Year: 1994
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Other Threats: Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures
    Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/16

  • Kizhi Pogost (1993)
    Russian Federation
    Year: 1993
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Other Threats: Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures
    Document Source: WHC.93/CONF.002/14

  • Kizhi Pogost (1992)
    Russian Federation
    Year: 1992
    Threats*: Financial resources,
    Other Threats: Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures
    Document Source: WHC.92/CONF.002/05

 Previous page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  ...  9  See All


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.