State of Conservation (SOC)
Talamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park (1992)
Document Source: CLT.92/CONF.003/03,WHC.92/CONF.002/05
Threats*:Ground transport infrastructure Management systems/ management plan Oil and gas
Wood Buffalo National Park (1992)
Other Threats: Bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis
Document Source: CLT.92/CONF.003/03,WHC.92/CONF.002/12
Threats*:Forestry /wood production Localised utilities Water infrastructure
States PartiesAlgeria Argentina Australia Brazil Bulgaria Canada Central African Republic Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Democratic Republic of the Congo Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia France Germany Greece Guinea Holy See Hungary India Italy Lebanon Madagascar Malta Montenegro Morocco Nepal New Zealand Niger Panama Romania Russian Federation Senegal Syrian Arab Republic Tunisia Turkey United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United States of America Zambia Zimbabwe
ThreatsManagement systems/ management plan(17) Housing(8) Illegal activities(7) Financial resources(7) Water infrastructure(6) Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation(5) Ground transport infrastructure(4) Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community(3) Civil unrest(3) War(3) Human resources(3) Legal framework(3) Management activities(3) Localised utilities(2) Surface water pollution(2) Land conversion(2) Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals(2) Mining(2) Oil and gas(2) Water (extraction) (2) Earthquake(2) Commercial development(1) Industrial areas(1) Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure(1) Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure(1) Major linear utilities(1) Air pollution(1) Input of excess energy(1) Pollution of marine waters(1) Crop production(1) Fishing/collecting aquatic resources(1) Forestry /wood production(1) Ritual / spiritual / religious and associative uses(1) Storms(1) Avalanche/ landslide(1) Erosion and siltation/ deposition(1) Fire (widlfires)(1) Governance(1)
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).