State of Conservation (SOC)

• Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1994)
  Tanzania, United Republic of
  Year: 1994
  Threats*: Crop production,
  Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.001/03B,WHC.94/CONF.001/03B Add.1
  

• Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1993)
  Tanzania, United Republic of
  Year: 1993
  Threats*: Crop production,
  Document Source: WHC.93/CONF.002/05
  

• Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1989)
  Tanzania, United Republic of
  Year: 1989
  Threats*: Management systems/ management plan, Financial resources,
  Danger List: Yes
  Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05,SC.89/CONF.004/11
  

• Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1988)
  Tanzania, United Republic of
  Year: 1988
  Threats*: Management systems/ management plan, Financial resources,
  Danger List: Yes
  Document Source: SC.88/CONF.001/04A
  

• Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1987)
  Tanzania, United Republic of
  Year: 1987
  Threats*: Management systems/ management plan, Financial resources,
  Danger List: Yes
  Document Source: SC.87/CONF.005/INF.1
  

• Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1986)
  Tanzania, United Republic of
  Year: 1986
  Threats*: Management systems/ management plan, Financial resources,
  Danger List: Yes
  Document Source: CC.86/CONF.003/INF.4,CC.86/CONF.001/11
  

• Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1985)
  Tanzania, United Republic of
  Year: 1985
  Threats*: Management systems/ management plan,
  Danger List: Yes
  Document Source: SC.85/CONF.008/09
  

• Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1984)
  Tanzania, United Republic of
  Year: 1984
  Threats*: Management systems/ management plan,
  Document Source: SC.84/CONF.001/04,SC.84/CONF.004/04
  

• Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1983)
  Tanzania, United Republic of
  Year: 1983
  Threats*: Management systems/ management plan,
  Document Source: SC.83/CONF.009/8
  

• Niokolo-Koba National Park (1993)
  Senegal
  Year: 1993
  Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan,
  Document Source: WHC.93/CONF.002/05
  

• Niokolo-Koba National Park (1992)
  Senegal
  Year: 1992
  Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan,
  Document Source: CLT.92/CONF.003/03,WHC.92/CONF.002/05
  

• Niokolo-Koba National Park (1990)
  Senegal
  Year: 1990
  Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan,
  Document Source: CC.90/CONF.003/03,CC.90/CONF.004/04
  

• Niokolo-Koba National Park (1989)
  Senegal
  Year: 1989
  Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan,
  Document Source: SC.89/CONF.003/02,SC.89/CONF.004/05
  

• Niokolo-Koba National Park (1988)
  Senegal
  Year: 1988
  Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan,
  Document Source: SC.88/CONF.001/04A
  

• Niokolo-Koba National Park (1987)
  Senegal
  Year: 1987
  Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan,
  Document Source: SC.87/CONF.005/INF.1
  

• Niokolo-Koba National Park (1986)
  Senegal
  Year: 1986
  Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities,
  Document Source: CC.86/CONF.003/INF.4,CC.86/CONF.001/11
  

• Old and New Towns of Edinburgh (2004)
  United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  Year: 2004
  Threats*: Housing,
  Other Threats: Fire
  Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
  

• Old City of Dubrovnik (1994)
  Croatia
  Year: 1994
  Threats*: War, Legal framework, Management systems/ management plan,
  Danger List: Yes
  Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/06 Add,WHC.94/CONF.003/06
  

• Old City of Dubrovnik (1993)
  Croatia
  Year: 1993
  Threats*: War, Legal framework, Management systems/ management plan,
  Danger List: Yes
  Document Source: WHC.93/CONF.001/03,WHC.93/CONF.002/05
  

• Old City of Dubrovnik (1992)
  Croatia
  Year: 1992
  Threats*: War, Management systems/ management plan,
  Danger List: Yes
  Document Source: CLT.92/CONF.003/02,WHC.92/CONF.002/05
  

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.